Archive for the ‘Books’ Category

Life’s Biggest Paradox

The recent posts on IQ, the intelligence gap, etcetera on Vox’s blog and his Sigma Game one too, along with a number of other recent considerations I have been mulling over with regard to the general malaise of this planet’s humanity both as a whole and as considered in their multiply fractal subdivisions right down to the individual, have got me to a point where I may begin to try to articulate a concept that I have been living with most of my life.

In simple terms it goes something like this:

Broadly speaking, almost nothing is really relevant, and yet, your life is absolutely relevant (regardless of whether you are aware of it, reach anything like your full potential in various facets of life and so on).

If you have read my post on violence and gunfights, you may be able to better understand what I mean. The long and the short of that post was that pretty much 95% of everything related to those two topics (assault/violence/gunfights) that you come across is bullshit.

The fact is that even if you train obsessively, unless you kinda go looking for it, the likelihood of you being in an actual gunfight are pretty close to nil. The chances of you being in some violent altercation are somewhat higher, but you can mostly negate those by the simple expedient of increasing your situational awareness in general even if you take zero time training in martial arts or using a firearms under stressful situations.

In the event that you DO end up in a gunfight, again, most of all the detailed supposedly pivotal information provided by armchair and paper experts, but even, too often, by supposedly highly trained “operators” is, again, mostly almost entirely irrelevant. If you can operate your weapon effectively under duress and hit a head-sized object repeatedly at twenty feet or less almost all the time, you are in the top 0.1% of people when it comes to being effective in a gun fight. The calibre or type of gun you use being a minor consideration at best.

Now, extend that sort of general realisation to pretty much everything else.

Unless you are in Ukraine or Gaza, the wars in those places are essentially mostly irrelevant to you. Not completely of course, because your petrol and heating costs go up, and so on, but the impact is not immediately drastic for 99% of the population on Earth compared to those who are actively involved. If you are generally prepared for the apocalyptic economic collapse that maths says will happen at some point, you are well ahead of the curve with respect of most of the rest of humanity. Obsessing about every detail of those conflicts can only lead to added anxiety and lowered immune systems without providing you any further benefit.

Given this overall philosophy, life could easily become seen as a futile exercise and one could easily slip into depression. That too is a trap, because while it is true that 95% of literally everything is bullshit, there is that 5% that makes it all worth it. And it would do so even if it was only 1%.

I always excelled at my job when I was in the corporate rat race and outperformed every financial target that was expected of me, even in those jobs where I was ultimately fired. And yes, I was “let go” on a number of occasions. And an even higher number of times I walked away on my own. How is it possible, you say that I double the expected profit margins and yet get “let go”? I must be lying, or missing out some part of the story, right? Not really. The only part of the story I am missing out is that several times I uncovered either outright fraud or incompetence within the higher ups. I didn’t even make it public for the most part, but the higher ups were aware I was aware. And they were also aware I was not corruptible. The idea a person would not either join them nor be against them necessarily, threatened them instantly (which is understandable).

My work in the UK was never seen by me as a “career”. If I had viewed it that way and applied myself that way, I would undoubtedly be a very wealthy person. That route however would have required a level of internal repression of my basic nature that made the prospect absolutely intolerable to me. I simply saw it as a job. In fact, as a job with a specific firm that would last as long as it lasted. Several years in the best cases, a few weeks in the worst cases. When I did my job, I did it very well and I put as much effort into it as needed to ensure I did outperform every target they had for me. I could do that precisely because it wasn’t that important to me. I am honest and I was hired to do a job so I did it well, but the job itself was not particularly interesting or meaningful to me. I took my satisfactions where I could and so on, and it’s nice to have a nice portfolio of prestigious jobs behind me, but I was perfectly happy being a mercenary that understood the value of both being a team member in a good team, or working independently when required.

I mention this to try and explain the perspective that most of life is filled with irrelevancies. Even the big events, while meaningful to you and some certainly will feel or even be life or death events from your perspective, are ultimately, in the scheme of things, not all that big a deal.

Your divorce and family implosion is a huge deal to you and your children, of course, and yet, most divorces are survived somehow. The culture is going to crap mostly everywhere, and yet you are generally comfortable enough as the world goes to Hell in a handbasket. From a bird’s eye view, very few things matter, and those that do are often things most people have very little control over.

So, if you have this perspective, I wanted to share with you my method for absolutely avoiding nihilistic despair, because I see people, especially younger people, falling into this absolute trap of thinking that since life is so “bad” nothing really matters. That is a mistake, a big, big error and one you should never make.

So here is my recipe:

  • Never, ever, assume the global is the personal and vice versa
  • Find the level of “resolution” that is important to you for different aspects of life and operate there. For example:
    • My professional work was relevant to me as maybe an 8 bit grayscale arcade game. You can still enjoy it and do well at Prince of Persia in monochrome, but you will not cry tears of despair if you need to switch to another 8 bit monochrome game like Bubble Bobble.
    • My personal life was always in full 8k colour and maximum level graphic card importance to me, though it had many facets and perspectives and within it each facet and perspective had a generally high level of resolution but not all had the highest resolution setting.
  • Have a compelling future. Without a target, something to aim for, an idea that motivates you to get out of bed in the morning, life can be misery, so, create something to work towards. And yet…
  • Be flexible in the extreme towards that future goal, because life invariably will throw monkey wrenches, the whole monkey, and the whole monkey’s troop with their monkey wrenches and also a few grenades in whatever plan you make. Life is essentially war, and as Clausewitz supposedly said, no plan survives contact with the enemy. This does not mean you are a butterfly with never solid targets, but rather the opposite, that whatever happens, and whatever route-changes you need to make, including drastic ones, you nevertheless continue heading towards the same goal from whatever unlikely position you end up finding yourself. The truth is that many high-minded concepts are usually extremely unlikely to happen in one or even two years, but relentless action in a specific direction almost always produces effective results over say 20 years.

I can attest to that “20 years” concept in a number of fields, where my interest was always high. In some cases I achieved a level of understanding or competence that then resulted in me deciding I had achieved what I wanted in that respect and then moved on to other interests, and in some cases the interest remains or even deepens and will continue to do so until death. A few examples (not to boast, but to give examples to those who might be new readers here as the numbers increase regularly):

  • Astronomy – I figured out the real history of Humanity to a previously unrealised degree, what happened on Mars and probably in other places of our Solar system to a degree that everyone else is still catching up to, including those who admitted plagiarising some of my work. I have reached a level of understanding of this that is sufficient for me to not devote much time to it now, primarily because my children and other endeavours occupy me and interest me more. Left to my own devices in a bubble universe, I would probably continue to explore this topic endlessly. And I still dream of building my own mini observatory.
  • Martial Arts – At age 54, and with a farm to try to get into some if not profitable at least break-even production level, 5 children and other things to do too, my interest for physically training with other people is not zero, but again, other priorities come into effect. If I won the lottery tomorrow and I could have my own little dojo build next to the house, I would happily entertain regular training with others, preferably not as teacher (unlikely, given the location) or at least, if I am to teach, so that I can also train with the guys while doing so. But as it is, my training today is mostly along a different route, which involves more generic concepts, like overall health, situational awareness on a daily basis and weapons training.
  • Catholicism – Having been a Zen Agnostic until age 43, so given only some ten years of study on it, I am still a relative “novice” at being a Catholic (compared to my own somewhat obsessive-compulsive standards, though I surpass many supposed “professional” theologians at understanding the dogma, application of it, history and realities of Catholicism) and the lessons in it, like those of martial arts, are infinite, so I think in some way this topic will continue to deepen for me with time.
  • Hypnosis – Having done and studied this deeply for nearly 20 years now, this remains a fascinating topic, though in deepening it, some related aspects have probably taken a front-seat, even if directly related to hypnosis, like the neurology and physiology of the brain as well as aspects of the mind, electromagnetic fields we all have, and other aspects related to mirror neurones and so on, all fasciante me and continue to be of interest.

Those are just my “hobbies” so to speak, my most important topics relate to relationships with women and ultimately marriage, relationships with my children, and loved ones, and relationships with my friends and the things we can achieve if we work together on some things we care about.

I certainly am not short of things that keep my interest despite me being acutely aware of the hellscape we live in and the mutant wastelands we are surrounded by, with roaming radioactive mutants, polluted skies and rabid zombies, along with gay, mentally ill, would-be “overlords” that want to destroy people like me down to the very last DNA strand.

Before I was Catholic I kept myself busy this way and never fell into despair. After becoming Catholic, not only is despair impossible, but I am at times mildly euphoric as I recognise that however hard things may temporarily seem from any given perspective of the day, eventually, due course, whether I see it myself with my own eyes or not, victory, for our side, is absolutely inevitable.

I hope therefore, to have given a few of you reading this some positive concepts to think and act on.

    Beware the Betrayer

    No one likes to be betrayed, but I am not talking about infidelity in your marriage here, rather, I am trying, as I have for years, to make you understand a core deceit that you have been living with all your life, like a hooded hawk, without even realising it.

    It has always amazed me over the last 4 decades or so, how often the masses, but also a decent number of supposedly, or even apparently intelligent people get fooled, and deceived by what to me, at first glance immediately give off a whiff of… sulphur? Deceit? Lies wired into the DNA. In short, the nefarious stench of the Freemasonic gatekeeper.

    If you were to study the history of the Catholic Church, you would come across plots so devious and intricate and ancient that any desire to delve into old conspiracies would be sated within hours and last probably the rest of your natural life if you wanted to keep digging. I covered the main aspects in RTCC, but the fact is that since the official formation of the Illuminati in 1776, the strategy of the Satanists (they have, like their boss, many, many names, Carbonari, Illuminati, Freemasons, Rosicrucians, and on and on and on) has always been the same:

    • Foment the masses into “regime change” by using class structure (marxism), race (BLM, Critical Race Theory, Math being racist, white “privilege” etcetera), religion (Islam vs everyone, Judaism being an innocent bystander/victim only wanting the best for humanity, Christianity in all it’s forms needing to be Protestant and less “problematic” about things like family, marriage, homosexuality, and so on), sex (feminism, homosexuality, gay adoption, trannies, bestiality, and pedophelia) and whatever else they can think up that is a Satanic inversion of the truth, that will get the useful idiot cattle into creating a stampede. It doesn’t really matter who gets trampled, chaos and the breakdown of cvil society and the inversion of justice is good.
    • Because naturally a percentage of people who are not COMPLETE morons will not like this, set up a number of “leaders” in the political, intellectual, legal, and social arenas, as “opponents” or “truth-tellers”. The purpose of this is manifold:
      • It gives the Satanists a good sense of the mass trends and success/failure of their campaigns
      • It identifies with specificity any potential resistors and “troublemakers” to their plans, so they can be dealt with in a number of ways.
      • It controls the followers of these “leaders” because invariably, they are “ineffective” they “fail” or they simply do a 180 degree about face.

    The point is that the Satanists, always, always, ALWAYS rig the game. Bet on red they win, bet on black, you lose.

    And even relatively sharp people like James Delingpole get taken in by these deceivers. His recent talk with David Icke and his post about it explain it, but he does not do a very good job in either case. If you look at the podcast from about one hour and thirty minutes in or so, James misses the opportunity to nail Icke to the floor by hammering the one nail he is absolutely correct on.

    Aside his fantastic, reptilianoid theories (which he has mutated into more palatable stuff over the years since he first started) even if you were to accept his ideas as somewhat coherent, James makes a very solid point: If Icke’s theories are correct, and we are being run in a simulation by demonic entities that use human bloodlines to control and enslave us and our “waking up” just means we see the bigger “allness” of it all but there is no God, no loving creator, no actual specific saviour, then what’s the point? And what is the origin of it all? Icke avoids the question like a greased eel and never gives a straight answer, and James gets flustered and lets him slide off.

    I would never waste 15 seconds of my time on Icke other than to expose him, so I would never have given him my time to begin with, but if I had been on that panel, I would have relentlessly hammered the point home. What’s it all about David? Where is “God” in your philosophy? And Icke kind of admitted there isn’t really a God, just an “allness”. But if that’s all there is, why the demons? Why their need to corrupt humanity? Are they just interdimnsional parasites and we are unlucky in this part of the Universe? It is, of course, nonsensical, and insofar as it could be making sense to a point, you lose sight of the fact that its real, subterfugeous and hidden aim, is really to distance you from the truth of God and hence the truth of how to fight back and not fall into deception and eventually the despair of hell.

    Icke and Alex Jones, Joe Rogan, and Milo YankmyPoleUs, Jordan Peterson, Andrew Tate (and his Gamma wizard that runs him), Emo Jones, Gay Gary Voris, Taylor Marshall, black science man, bowtie “do butt stuff’ science man, the entire Vatican, Bergoglio and his retinue of pedophiles and frauds, Protestantism as a whole, the “right” and “left” political parties, really pretty much everything in modern life is really just designed to distract you, delay you, and waste your life in inconsequential, or (better yet for them) self-destructive, nefarious, degenerate nonsense, and if you begin to get an inkling of an idea about the truth, then they want you wallowing in the retard pool of the fake “truthers” that tell you tidbits of information and then blend it in with complete nonsense. The Flat Earth stuff is a typical example. Mix it in and get operatives to bring it up in groups that maybe are actually looking at real stuff, like antigravity technology, and it gives the whole exercise a sudden stench of retardation and so-called normal people don’t even look at any of it because it’s like picking sewage out of your ice-cream.

    And these are not coincidences or temporary efforts, there are endless money and conscious plots to stop any truth, and real resistance, and any truth about Catholicism at all getting out. There are powerful people with essentially infinite resources dedicated to this stuff. So they are not going away and no, none of them are “salvageable”.

    I have been explaining this in as many ways as possible since my early to mid-twenties. It is literally a strategy identified in the Permanent Instructions to the Alta Vendita (Carbonari) and these documents were captured and discussed in the Papacy some 200 years ago. I mention them in RTCC and translate some extracts and related documents, so you don’t have to take my word for it, I give you the references.

    But above all, my point is simply this:

    BEWARE the gatekeepers. When a nobody suddenly shoots to fame for being “a good guy” against the homoglobos, be extremely suspicious, and look into his background. Especially if they are heavily funded.

    Of course, aside the gatekeepers there are also a bunch of cracked eggs that believe all sorts of insane stuff, like the Flat Earthers, and so on, but the David Ickes of the world can be both in your face as well as subtle, and you need to learn to spot them in the wild.

    And if you are despairing right now and thinking, but then, what is true? What refuge is there?

    Refuge? Not much son, we are at war don’t you know? It’s a war between Satan and his minions, in all their forms, and Christ and his soldiers, on the other side. Here, learn about 1958 Sedevacantist Catholicism, AFTER you learn about REAL Catholicism first. Then tell me if that doesn’t describe and fit and make sense of the world as we have it today better than any other philosophy since the dawn of man.

    No refuge, but there is an almost dry trench here, plenty of ammo, a good bayonet and trench clubs, and if you keep on your toes, you might even get a cup of hot coffee and some toast and jam before we crawl through the mud in the dead of night to go send those demons back to the pit they crawled out of.

    Welcome. (Pats you on the back as he hands you your rifle and ammo).

      Dirty Harry Philosophy

      He really does.

      A lot of people are wondering what they can do about the current situation in their lives, and perhaps struggling to come up with answers. Generally, I have always advised that you really don’t know what you can do until your back is against the wall and you have no options. So, generally, fight like a bastard is the go-to. And generally, it is a sound philosophy, after all, you can rest when you are dead, right?

      Furthermore, your doubt about what, if anything, you can do, almost always stems from your simply not knowing yourself well and deep enough. It is the central aspect of what I explained in detail in my Systema book. And it long been knows that this is the very base of any man’s life. The same concept was also written down at the Oracle of Delphi in Ancient Greece: “Man, know yourself.” So it is really imperative you do the necessary work (usually involving blood, sweat and tears in large quantities) to figure out right down to your DNA, who you really are.

      At times, though, and if you have had enough life experience to really know what your limitations are —which are generally at least an order of magnitude more than you think when you are in your teens and twenties and maybe even early thirties in some respects— life will come along in a way that will basically be a nuclear bomb going off too close, Godzilla stomping you, or a horde of orcs surrounding you on a plain.

      Of course, if there really is no way out, then, you may as well take as many heads as you can on your way out.

      But at times, the issue is simply one where you’re going to have to realise, you can only walk away. And nothing more.

        On Raising Girls

        Thanks to TrevorGoodchild on Gab, I was made aware of this long but very good post on the female perspective of the modern radioactive wasteland that is the current era in terms of social interactions.

        One of the most insightful passages was this:

        Feeling alienated from your body, disliking the male attention your body invites, secretly feeling a kind of thrill when your beauty benefits you, enjoying the power you hold over men: these are feelings girls commonly experience as they transition to womanhood.

        In a healthy society, young girls eventually come to terms with these complex and somewhat contradictory feelings. This is not the case today. Today, young women are rewarded most for acting on their most pathological impulses. Platforms such as Instagram and OnlyFans incentivize some young women to profit from the male gaze to the detriment of their future well-being. On the other hand, for young women who feel alienated by their sexual desirability (or lack thereof), there exist a plethora of alternative online communities like FTM or pro-eating disorder spaces that offer young women refuge from the male gaze, while offering them emotional support and subcultural status.

        What is not at all encouraged is coming to terms with the complex feelings womanhood induces within young girls, coming to terms with that mix of terror and thrill. This process is entirely disrupted by modern social norms. Why? Because sexual norms today skirt around one obvious, horrifying fact: women like being sex objects. That eighteen year old on OnlyFans? She’s not motivated by entrepreneurial drive, economic desperation, patriarchal socialization, or any such external factor we may want to point to. No, she simply likes the idea of being a hot commodity, of being so sexy that men would pay to see her. She likes being a whore. Acknowledging women’s innate desire to be sexualized, to be objectified, is sacrilegious; it is a truth conveniently avoided by both feminists and traditionalists alike. Instead, they posit that women’s behaviour is entirely downstream of that of men’s, that if men didn’t desire women so much, that if they stopped watching porn, stopped “objectifying women,” stopped having sex outside of marriage, that all sexual degeneracy would disappear. And so, male sexuality is criminalized, and female sexuality is conveniently ignored. And while this set of social norms preserves a rosy, hapless image of women, it harms young girls through its complete lack of social regulation of feminine sexual impulses. If you do not restrict female sexual impulses, what you get is a race to the bottom, with young girls intensely competing with each other for sexual attention. A lack of common sense limitations leads to a rise in things like unnecessary plastic surgeries, the proliferation of photoshop, hypersexual online personas. The digital landscape is flooded with images of inhumanly beautiful women. Intense sexual competition has adverse effects on other young girls by either encouraging them to adopt such behaviours, or by alienating them from womanhood entirely.

        Male fantasies, male fantasies, is everything run by male fantasies? Up on a pedestal or down on your knees, it’s all a male fantasy: that you’re strong enough to take what they dish out, or else too weak to do anything about it. Even pretending you aren’t catering to male fantasies is a male fantasy: pretending you’re unseen, pretending you have a life of your own, that you can wash your feet and comb your hair unconscious of the ever-present watcher peering through the keyhole, peering through the keyhole in your own head, if nowhere else. You are a woman with a man inside watching a woman. You are your own voyeur”

        .—Margaret Atwood, The Robber Bride

        Ultimately, what growing up means for girls, is coming to terms with the male gaze. The male gaze, contrary to the popular feminist conception of it, is not a product of patriarchal society. Rather, the voyeur in your own head is a native facet of feminine psychology. The voyeur in your head is awareness of your desirability, the power it holds, the danger it can bring; this awareness is crucial for women to have as they navigate the world around them.

        And the most insightful sentence in that extract was this:

        She likes being a whore.

        That one sentence, in the context it was written, is, as the writer correctly identifies, the biggest taboo of the modern world. That admission can never be made in public without the person saying it being essentially cancelled as some kind of woman-hating, (internalised if you are female like the writer, of course) patriarchal pig/slave (depending on if you’re a man/woman) and so on.

        Now, those men among us who had a past that involved being intimate with a rather high number of women, in a secularised context absent pretty much all religion of any kind, will know that pretty much every woman has that impulse somewhere in her make up. I’m sure there are exceptions, but they are generally not what one would refer to as “normal” women. Some may be the result of rape, sexual abuse, and so on. Some may be neuro-atypical and so on, as always, nothing is always all the same, there are always exceptions, but by and large, the average woman, has in her a “I want to feel like a whore” button. Some are more aware of it than others, of course, and some are unaware of it until a man flicks that button a few times expertly, but as I say, in most cases it’s there. It is, in essence, a normal biological aspect of femaleness, just like it is a biological aspect of maleness to like feeling like a conquering hero (or anti-hero, whatever, the conquering and winning part is what makes us feel alive).

        Did you see that Sci-Fi film with Arnie called Total Recall (it’s badly based on a PKD story) but anyway when they are presenting him with a fictional fantasy holiday and they ask him what romantic partner he would like for his fantasy induced “holiday” and they say “be honest” he gives up and indeed says: “Slutty”.

        Using the word all/every in the same context as above, i.e. a generalisation, it is simply a fact that every man wants a whore in bed and a lady outside of their bedroom (well, ok, home in general, maybe public toilets, secluded spots in parks, back of cars… you know what I mean!).

        The ideal woman for most men is a complete slut in bed, open to all the sexual excitement and fantasies he might have, but… loyal most of all and forever to just him.

        And the ideal man for pretty much every woman, is a man that is manly enough to make her want to behave like a complete whore in bed. But who has eyes only for her.

        The ideal relationship for both sexes is one where the other partner inspires almost unbridled sexuality and sensuality for you, while at the same time confining it within the limits of your relationship.

        Yes, I am aware that there are large (and growing) areas of the population where wife-swapping, cuckolding, orgies, multiple sex partners and other fetishes actually take place, but those relationships where those aspects of sex become a regular reality instead of remain limited to a private fantasy, invariably end in tears and tragedy. There are no successful “polyamorous” relationships or long term “throuples”. Every one of those perversions of the natural order of one man and one woman is not conducive to the maximum happiness for both. Some might be artificially sustainable, such as the practice of having multiple wives. Historically there are instances where powerful men or certain societies permitted men to have multiple wives, and such societies still exist and one could say “function” after a fashion, but the reality is that neither the man nor the women in those situation had reached their maximum potential for true, deep, lasting serenity, and that is for a very simple reason:

        Maximum serenity is achieved when you have real, deep, intimate connection to another human being and that can only be achieved at its deepest and most pervasive level in an intimate relationship between a man and a woman.

        Oh, you might touch aspects of it in certain fetishised moments of a relationship that is not classical of that kind. Certainly I have experienced in my pre-catholic days a certain level of sexual gratification/understanding with some women, that even though was at times simply limited to that singular or infrequent encounter due to the temporary nature of the “relationship” achieved a certain level of “understanding” or feeling of mutual acceptance without any judgement or however you want to label it, that it does achieve a sense of closeness, an aspect, if you will, of “love” or at least a facet of it. But one might make the same statement of perhaps a pair of serial killers finding a moment of “spark” as they hunch over their latest victim to cannibalise it. Yes, yes, you might have felt something that you might think is “deep” and insofar as your experience of life might go (you know as a serial killer, or serial slut (of either sex)) it may well have been the “highlight” to date of your connection with another human being, and because sex is so powerful, if you just had your third and most mind-blowing orgasm in a row while trussed up in some S&M position in your full gimp outfit and a livecam to your only fans only “enhancing” the thrill for you, you might think you have reached the pinnacle of human intimacy. But you have not. You may have touched bottom on a deep dive into some fetishism, specific degenerate thing or even wide-spread generic degeneracy, but true, deep, pervasive intimacy, you have not reached sir, or madam. And trust me, I speak from a rather extensive degenerate past and experience on the matter.

        The level of human intimacy that truly calms and fills you with a genuine and pervasive experience of love, is only generated between one man and one woman. Instinctively we all know that from birth. As the ancient Greeks and others knew, there are various forms of love, and we can define different relationships on the basis of it, but the one that covers all of them the most is simply the one that is of a man and woman who choose a life together to make children and raise them. Anything else is a shadow at best if not a cruel parody that brings only misery (gay “marriages” and the accompanying child trafficking that results from gay “adoptions”).

        Your relationship with a woman you are particularly compatible with sexually might feel fulfilling, and indeed such relationships usually last quite long if there is at least a baseline of other factors to support it, but amazing sex on its own will not do it, yet, in the modern era, the focus is on that first and foremost.

        If you have daughters and are raising them and you are unaware of these facts, or worse, you try to ignore them pretending they are not realities, your daughters are headed for the rocks in the metaphoric navigation of life.

        Acknowledging a girls’ natural inclinations due to her biological sex is required, as is required your duty as father to teach her how to avoid the pitfalls of her own biology. Just as you do with a boy you would raise. But as a man, raising a boy is easier, because firstly, we are simpler, secondly we are men, so we know what it’s like to be one, and thirdly, boys are generally responsive to plain logic and direct line of thinking. The pitfalls for both boys and girls are mostly handled by the same skill: The ability to regulate your own emotions. Difficult as it is for all human beings, the skill is generally a lot easier to achieve for boys. and once again, the reasons are mainly biological.

        Female brain structure is physically different in some important aspects from male brain structure. Their hormones affect them and their thinking, mood, mind and brain to degrees that men can only imagine, but rarely experience outside of perhaps drug induced stupors.

        Helping a young girl navigate not only the outside world, but her own biology and emotion-inducing hormones, is a far more delicate and complicated matter.

        You do need to be aware of her biology and not demonise aspects of her that are natural things, but you also need to teach her to regulate these things in a way that leads to healthy and positive outcomes for her and steers her away from negative outcomes. And you also need to appreciate that for a girl or woman, the ability to control her emotions in a positive fashion tends to be far more restrictive. Historically every functioning society has known this, placing heavy and strict restrictions on female sexuality. And of course the feminists will tell you it was all to oppress women and so on, but the reality is that (as the article mentioned also points out clearly) women, left to their own devices tend to make horrifically bad decisions and civilisations tend to collapse in short order when this is the case.

        An innocuous example might suffice.

        In teaching self-discipline to my children, the approach with the boy, who is only 4, is very much simpler and direct. He’s been told eating too much sweets or say chocolate, or whatever is not good for him and we want the best for him and as a result he simply asks if he can have this or that and when he is told no, at most he asks why. Provided a clear explanation he accepts the decision most times. His little sister seeing him do this is more disposed to following suit… I say more disposed… not how much more… It’s a tiny amount. She will argue and try to pull a fast one a lot more than he does. My eldest daughter on the other hand is a complete choc-aholic. I was the same and even in my thirties and later I could eat three full chocolate slabs and think nothing of it. When I was swimming competitively as a teenager and living alone in the UK I survived on cheese and chocolate and random meals I microwaved. I was never fat, because I always moved and I have lucky genetics. She is very similar in this regard, but when I explained it is not healthy and she should not devour whatever chocolate is in the house (something she did like a thief in the night several times) and I finally put my foot down hard, far more on the sneaky way she had done it than the thing itself, the next time we went shopping and it was just me and her and I said should we get some chocolate, she said no. Surprised I asked how come. Her explanation was enlightening:

        “Because I can’t really control myself if I know we have it in the house. So if it’s not there, at least I can’t go and eat it.”

        The boy would simply be ok with not touching it until he’s told it’s ok to do so, or limit himself to one or two pieces a day or week or whatever we decided, but the girl realised her own will-power or discipline was not enough and so took steps to safeguard against her own known weakness.

        That subtle but extremely important difference plays out throughout most of a woman’s life.

        And returning to sex, because it is such a powerful force, if a girls’ (also natural) defences against being bedded are bypassed by some slight of hand/emotional manipulation/general social pressure, and then repeatedly so, her ability to bond deeply with another human being becomes scarred over by each encounter, making it progressively harder to make it a possibility.

        Being aware of these things as a father is of paramount importance, and I am astonished at the level of absolute incompetence we see today in the parenting skills in general but especially of how pathetic so many men are at being fathers for their daughters.

        I see comments from apparently fathers that ask things like: “What can I do? I mean the sex stuff is everywhere and my daughters dress like whores, but it can’t be helped, and where will they find a good man?”

        Well buddy, short a miracle, they won’t because they never had one in the first place where they should have: Their home! You weakling, metrosexual, pathetic excuse for a father.

        Seriously, the more I look at Clown World with a bird’s eye view, the more I realise that I was absolutely right ten years ago, some 3 years before I even got baptised, when I said that two things would be pivotal: Christianity (which I have since come to view as being limited to actual Catholicism i.e. 1958 Sedevacantism) and city states, because once the SHTF it will be communities that stick together that will resit and survive whatever evil wind comes their way.

        I hope more and more people will see these truths soon, and that is happening, even if I know the numbers will never approach what my blue-sky tinted heart would wish.

        But you never know; God does act in mysterious ways; and he does have a powerful sense of humour, after all: He made me a hardcore Believer.

        This last piece from the article is another important point (emphasis added):

        Why are young women today so deranged? Because no one is honest with them and they cannot be honest with themselves. Parents lie to you, teachers lie to you, friends lie to you, everyone lies to you. If anyone dares tell you the truth, they are ostracized.

        There is the ultimate betrayal. Parents who lie to their children about reality. Life. Basic stuff. And many do so because they are so retarded and brainwashed themselves they honestly don’t know any better.

        But many do it because of the fear of running against the grain. Of indeed, being ostracised.

        Luckily for my daughters, I never gave a flying fornication at a rodent’s anus what pretty much the entire rest of humanity thought of me or if I was well-liked or feared or infamous. As a result, no matter how counter-narrative the truth may be, there is never any worry that they will not be told how two plus two is always, without any exception, forever and ever, four.

          How decline works

          I was recently sent some statistics about how the Novus Orco fake Catholic Church is in impressive decline.

          On spending some more time researching global trends not just in the USA but all over, the picture that emerges is not as clear cut for most. There are however, large trends which can be observed:

          • Attendance at Mass is generally dropping in the Western world
          • Overall numbers are in general decline in the West
          • Attendance and Overall numbers are in general increase in Africa and Asia
          • The largest number of priests are in the West and their fake seminarians are in decline, while they are on the increase in the fake priest starved African and Asian countries.
          • Demographic changes in places like the USA can give false positives, for example, Florida and Texas seem to have increased in the number of Catholics in general, however, much of this is due to influx of several million people from South of the border over the last decade.

          All of the above fits perfectly with the general pattern that any empire, organisation or global institution follows when it is collapsing.

          Generally it has the following steps:

          1. General demoralisation of the core participants
          2. Lower attendance/use of the services
          3. Despondent attendance/use by those who do continue
          4. Frantic efforts to “modernise” by the organisation
          5. Apparent “increase” in client base (temporary)
          6. Real decrease in core clientele
          7. The “increase” are non-paying/non-participating general hangers-on
          8. collapse of the core functions of the organisation
          9. general malaise
          10. splitting/merging “diversification”
          11. morphing into something different in survival attempt
          12. generic collapse with pockets of residual hard-core subscribers
          13. eventual death of the organisation with mere “colourings” of its passing lingering on for a generation or two

          Vox Day wrote a more detailed work concerning the corporate cancer of wokeism and how it destroys organisations from the inside, and you may want to look at that if you need to understand the process more thoroughly, though it may not map as well on a religious organisation that is in one respect almost 2000 years old, and in another respect came into full effect only in 1958 (when Roncalli became the first fake “Pope” of the currently unbroken era of Satanists pretending to be Catholic sitting in the Vatican).

          In my estimation the fake Catholic Church is currently in stages 11-12.

          The situation is a little complicated by two main factors:

          1. The change was a subterfugeous hostile takeover that remains mostly completely not understood by the average nominal lay “Catholic”. While the takeover is always hostile and always subterfugeous in this kind of situation, at some point, the greater part of the company understands that it has been parasitically taken over, and shortly after that, the customers leave in droves. Here, the greater part of the company has literally been swept under the carpet as the replacement took place over about 200 years, and the tragedy is that the average “customer” is aware that the “product” now sucks but has not realised that management and all staff have changed from normal humans to soul-sucking vampires and so remain in a generic state of confusion that tends to “resolve” as: “Oh well… I guess Catholicism isn’t really real… or for me…” and they wander off in a daze, or “remain” and “attend” in a daze, in both cases the result is a basic “zombiefication” of what used to be Catholics; and that is precisely the intent.
          2. The second point that complicates this greatly is the timescale. This is not a hostile takeover measured in the normal course of human business affairs. It is a hostile takeover that has been repeatedly attempted for 20 centuries and began to really bear fruit at its start in the late 1700s and came into its own by the early 1900s and achieved almost all its aims by the current date of 2024. Human minds are not generally geared to realise a plot that spans that length of time, even when the results are obvious is pointed out in chronological order and summarised.

          The process of infiltration ran from about the 1780s to the 1920s so about 140 years, with the first 100 years or so of that dedicated mostly to the destruction of the royal houses that surrounded the Church.

          From about the 1920s to the 1950s and beyond the absolute stuffing of the Church with malicious actors (fake priests with he sole intent of destroying the Church) went into overdrive and continued to the present day. In fact it was so successful that there isn’t a valid priest left in the entire Novus Orco organisation. They are all impostors and have been since the mid 1960s but certainly all of them by 1983 at the latest when they produced a “new” fake and satanic “Code of Canon Law” to try and destroy the immutable one of 1917 created by two valid Popes with a dedicated team of properly Catholic Cardinals and theologians.

          From 1958 to really the fake election of Bergolgio to the “Papacy” in 2013 the process was really steps 8 through 11. from about 2015 to 2023 it was a period of realisation (which continues and will continue for several years yet) that collapse is setting in. The death of Ratzinger made the fact that the present Satanic institution masquerading as Catholicism is not Catholic in any way, far more apparent to many more people. And when Bergoglio finally kicks the bucket and goes to meet his boss, in all likelihood in the 9th circle of Hell, the next absolute clown show of a “Papal” election will be the death knell of any illusion anyone can have that whatever has taken hold in the Vatican is Catholicism.

          However, the complication remains that because of how this was all done, most lay-people remain abysmally ignorant of what Catholicism was from the beginning, what it remained and what it still exists as, in real Catholic Churches, priests, bishops and laymen, that is, in the remnant of actual Catholicism that is left: Sedevacantism.

          If the average, nominal, cradle “Catholic” was suddenly faced with the facts concerning what really happened to Catholicism and by whom this was orchestrated and how, that is, if the average human still possessed the attention span, intelligence, focus, and drive to pay attention to a lecture or two of a couple of hours and bothered to research things themselves that are mentioned, or simply read Reclaiming the Catholic Church, they would convert to Sedevacantism with a vengeance. At least, insofar as any human being is able to change their mind based on facts instead of their cherished (but erroneous) opinions. And we know thanks to Aristotle that many people are actually unable to change their minds even when incontrovertible facts are placed right before their nose and they are free to test and check them for themselves (they invariably never do and instead just stick to their illogical, flawed, childish “belief” because it is intimately tied to their self-identity). We also know thanks to Professor Cipolla’s first law of human stupidity that there are always a far larger number of idiots than you can possibly imagine or guess, and the last four years have demonstrated this in spades, of course.

          So, my estimate for the generic collapse of the Novus Orco is that over the next 50 years it will essentially be reduced to some kind of social club, kind of like reader’s digest of the 1970s and probably have faded out in terms of any belief system certainly by the end of the 21st Century. However, the vast resources of the original Catholic Church will drag out the “survival” of a demonic infested structure of some kind or other possibly for centuries unless there is some kind of quite spectacular reconquista; especially since the indemoniated will not go quietly into the night, but will fight tooth and claw to hang on to the corpse and material spoils of what used to be property and wealth of the Catholic Church.

          On the positive side, real Catholicism, in the form of Sedevacantism continues to grow. New Chapels and Churches continue being acquired, congregations are becoming standing room only and Sedevacantist families continue to produce a lot of children regardless of the perilous economic conditions we are all placed under and real Catholics in particular since we are already under attack from not just the Satanists posing as Catholics, but as recent leaks from the FBI demonstrated, all the secular Satanic forces are also specifically aimed against real Catholics. More so than any other religious denomination. Which of course, is a sign we are over the target.

          At some point, the puppeteers that see themselves as masters of the world, who have started and continue the ongoing WWIII, a mixture of fake, bio-engineered pandemics (which they make more deadly in due course), actual war, false-flags, pervasive homosexual and transgender agenda aimed primarily at children, and so on, will end up wanting to wipe out the Sedevacantists altogether.

          In our favour is the fact that Clown World is so spectacularly idiotic that they are currently in freewill thanks to Russia, China and the various BRICS nations. which if nothing else, buys Sedevacantists time to grow and become more organised at national and international levels. However, the eventual global economic collapse that must at some point take place (because math, sooner or later, comes to roost and really doesn’t care about anyone’s opinions) will no doubt put a lot of strain on everyone, and even if the BRICS political faction “wins” it’s not to say that Sedevacantists will have any better time under that regime. In the first place China has been absolutely oppressive in regard to actual Catholicism, seeing it as a competition for authority, which cannot be allowed in a political milieu that call it what you like, still follows the model of a supreme leader/emperor having total power and crushing anyone that challenges him. Russia is nominally “orthodox” and while they might not directly attack Sedevacantist Catholics, it is unlikely that Catholicism will be viewed positively, given the long history of schism.

          The best hope is that in the ruins of collapsing Western Civilisation, two things happen:

          1. The nationalists in each European and Western country win and take power. With any luck relatively bloodlessly, because the longer it takes the less likely that things like civil wars will not happen.
          2. These nations expel almost all foreigners from their nations and return to the primary function of any actual nation, which is the care and protection of its native population.

          Under those two conditions then actual Catholicism is very likely to make a strong comeback and perhaps even in my lifetime, make the facts known so clearly and so widely that an actual real Papal election takes place.

          The only current objection to a real Papal election taking place now is that the Sedevacantist faction is still too small to not be drowned out by the prostitutes in the employ of the secularists and the Vatican Satanists. I am speaking of course of all the outlets from which the mass media vomits it lies. And yes, once again, I apologise profusely to prostitutes everywhere for comparing them to something as disgusting as journalists. I assure these hard-working sinners that my comparison is merely due to the unfortunate metaphoric representations the average idiot has in his head. Comparison of journalists to plague-ridden, sewer rats covered in filth, would still be insulting to the rats too, but until the larger population realises what journalists actually are like, I will have to go with the unfortunate popular metaphors.

          If the Sedevacantist Bishops elected a real Pope, it would be made into a laughing stock and labelled as “yet another” trailer-park Pope. Awareness of the truth needs to be far more widespread before the actual Catholic Church can rise again from its ashes, as it eventually will.

          So, that is my take on things and it should be a source of inspiration, since our enemies have no way of avoiding their ongoing, inevitable, even if slow, total collapse. While we, are just as inevitably growing and will return to a wider glory across the Earth. That is even more certain, because as we know even if this were the End Times, in the end, we win. And I for one, am not concerned whether we are in the End Times not, because it does not matter, either we are, and we win, or we are not, and we win. So just keep on going and keep on building Sede communities and making more Sede children.

          Nec Spe, Nec Metu.

            All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
            Website maintained by mindseed design