Archive for the ‘Fighting SJWs’ Category

Versus… “Toxic” Catholicism

See the immediately previous post below this one, before reading this one. They are linked and you really need to see that one first.

The image below has been blurred for obvious privacy reasons, nevertheless I asked the two ladies in it beside my wife if it was ok to use and they both immediately enthusiastically said yes.

These are three catholic women with their children.

3 women, 15 children.

This, ladies, is what a strong, powerful, heroic woman looks like.

There isn’t one of the women in the picture who has a husband that wouldn’t take a bullet for them. Or that doesn’t appreciate the daily sacrifices they make and love them all the more for it.

I’m not one to “gush” or pedastalise women, as any reader of this blog will know, but neither am I the supposed “misogynist” some toothless overweight shrews might try to label me as.

The truth is that when I saw this picture, shortly after it was taken, it encapsulated for me everything that life is really about. The kids all played awesomely together, and the two women beside my wife are awesome people. The fact that between three of them they have made 15 children is nothing short of heroic, as far as I am concerned.

One of the mums said, “Nah, not heroes.”

I reminded her, as I will any man reading, that as far as I know, there isn’t a man alive that would consider giving birth ONCE not being heroic. Meeting a woman that has given birth to five or more children, as far as men are concerned, trust me, is the equivalent of talking to a Victoria Cross recipient.

Anyway, try and argue against that, Feminists. And… what’s that? Oh, wait, we can’t hear you over the laughter of our children, and the silence of your non-existent progeny, as ours go on to re-populate the Earth after the depopulation attempts of those who fooled you to begin with.

    Toxic Feminism

    In Caveman Theory I describe in more detail how women have several challenges before them, one is the learning to do logic and reason better, in order to catch up to the changes men have taken on over the last hundred years or so, but I also have a whole section on how women have been dehumanised by the various narratives.

    It is an insidious process and has resulted in a lot of damage to both sexes. Men, because they become dumb and binary in their conception of women, and women more or less for the same reason, but even more so, because all the beauty, subtlety and positive aspects of women get literally obliterated.

    Here is a typical example, placed outside one of the local councils in Italy.

    Yes it’s a crappy picture, but it deserves no better. The writing says:

    Some women choose to follow men, others choose to follow their dreams.

    That is what in hypnosis is called a double-bind. It’s language that is supposed to present a choice, but in reality removes all options. The unstated implication, which your unconscious picks up on even if your conscious brain does not, is that following a man MUST be mutually exclusive to following your dreams.

    The juxtaposition is EITHER you follow your dreams (and abandon men altogether) OR you follow a man, AND THEREFORE, NECESSARILY abandon your dreams altogether.

    There is no place at all, in that false equivalency statement for a woman that WANTS and maybe (gasp!) even LIKES the idea of being gently led by a man that cares about her, and making a home for him and their children, being a housewife that dedicates herself to her family that way, as her husband does by providing for them all.

    Even a woman that just sees the making of a family with a man, the literal creation of children and raising them, as her aim in life, is essentially left with a bad “taste” from that idiotic sign. Because the implication there, unstated directly but absolutely implied by the double-bind, is that your own dreams and sensations of being in the right place with the universe are impacted on, in direct proportion to which you liaise with a man.

    It is literally evil. The sole intent of it is to try and drive a wedge of mistrust, depression and blame on the man for “destroying her dreams”. And women being solipsistic, remember, they are already inclined to believe two other nonsensical ideas:

    1. That life is about “being happy” ( a concept they cannot rigidly define if their life depended on it), and
    2. That whoever is nearest them, is inevitably responsible for whatever misery they feel, even if it comes form their own lack of imagination, genetic depression, recent drug use, or whatever else.

    So that sentence is perfectly designed to attach itself to the weaknesses of a woman to begin with and then weaponise them against men in general.

    I go into a lot more depth in the book on this, but think about it for a second, thanks to a bunch of shows, from Everybody Loves Raymond to Peppa Pig, the zeitgeist has been to present men and especially fathers and husbands as bumbling idiots. The reality is that if those “bumbling idiots” disappeared from existence today, before the week-end women would be savagely assaulting each other in the street, and two weeks later would probably be reduced to Haitian levels of anarchy and cannibalism.

    That aside, the general practice of complimenting a man, or being grateful to him for his efforts in the family home, are essentially as rare as dodo teeth.

    There are literally countless support groups for women, for every possible thing that might happen to them in life, but there are no such structures or support groups for men. In most cases there really isn’t even a single support group of any kind in most cities around the world. And it’s all fuelled by toxic nonsense like that image.

    99.9999% of people will not even realise the subliminal messaging they are subjected to in this regard throughout their day. This is not noticed or understood by women nor men. But you are being lied to and trained to respond in certain ways. Women on a generic, unspecified, nebulous anger at men (for stealing their dreams, don’t you know!) and men, given this, will tend to treat women as disposable ejaculation ports, because why shouldn’t they, when they are denigrated and treated as if they are all some kind of woman hating, perverted, incompetent idiots, well… may as well play along then, because fuck it.

    And the result is a mechanisation, dehumanisation, objectification of both men and women. Those are the fruits of Feminism. A landscape deserted of emotions other than bitterness, acidity, shrewishness, anger, sadness, and so on. In short, a lovelessness that makes the barren land of the Moon seem a fertile forest.

    In the immediately next post, I will show you what actual women, real women, who have not bought into that narrative, and who appreciate, respect, and listen to their husbands look like. And why, because of it, they are loved beyond measure by the men they married. By being truly female, truly feminine, they have achieved that kind of marriage and relationship that not only lasts over time, but continues to grow and evolve and creates a tapestry of life that is passed down to children, grandchildren and so on.

    I was going to tack that on here, but it deserves its own post, and I think you’ll see why.

      This is Absolutely the Way

        Attrition Warfare

        The last few years have added considerably to the doctrine of attrition warfare, which was only broadly considered at the time of WWII and probably hardly thought of at the level of individual soldiers.

        Today, any soldier that is not sub 85 IQ should have a much better understanding of the concept of attrition warfare, and thus be able to apply it even at squad or individual soldier level.

        First a brief overview of the concept in historical context.

        Attrition warfare is basically the process of exhausting the enemy’s resources at every level, materiel, food, vehicles, people, fuel, and even the home economy of the country or region opposing you.

        The basic premise is simple: Make the perpetuating of war on you and yours so expensive in terms of all of the above that the enemy either retreats (sub-optimal result as they will likely regroup then try again, with better intelligence) or bankrupt them to the point that they are defeated or at least run away with such losses that the regrouping will be long, painful and unlikely, which also give you time to regroup, solidify gains and prepare.

        Due to its nature, attrition warfare greatly favours the home team. Vietnam and Afghanistan are prime examples of how rice farmers and goat herders, armed with far inferior weapons and technology and no air power to speak of, nevertheless eventually beat off the most powerful military in the world like mangy dogs.

        Iraq, Syria and Iran will do the same regarding the current and somewhat ongoing troubles in the Middle East since the early 1990s.

        The IRA in Ireland finally wore down the English government too. In short, history is filled with examples of what essentially amounts to attrition warfare. It really only requires one thing, which is a cultural aspect primarily, and that is, the morale or culture to never give up and always, always, always, continue the warfare by every means against the occupying force. Attrition warfare is not really an option when you are the “away team” as America and the whole of NATO has clearly shown us in the last two years, as they have exhausted their weapons, their willpower (if there was ever any) their logistics and damaged the economies of the entire NATO/USA Globohomo industrial complex.

        These are the broad brushstrokes, but let us now focus on the much higher resolution aspects when these are considered from the individual or small team level of operations, which essentially means guerrilla warfare, or basically local resistance movements in an occupied country or region.

        The negatives for the “rebels” are obvious to all. No economy of scale, lower quality weaponry, no access to high-tech offensive and defensive capabilities like military drones, armoured vehicles, tanks, helicopters and so on. The likelihood of higher or even total annihilation if a force-on-force battle is engaged in and so on.

        However, there are many advantages that when made use of, over a long period of time eventually result in victory, in no particular order, these are:

        • Knowledge of local conditions and terrain
        • Intelligence from locals and friendly disposition towards the rebels by the locals of the same ethnicity, religion and so on, which can provide also ongoing material support (food, water, hide-outs and so on)
        • Understanding local customs and culture (assuming the invader is foreign). If the invader is the country’s own military, this will be much reduced but still somewhat applicable (EG the Basques in Spain, the IRA in Ireland, and so on.)
        • the ability to cause extensive damage to the enemy for little to no cost, some examples:
          • A single round through an aircraft cockpit grounds it and uses up mechanics, and support staff and renders the designated pilot useless.
          • The death of a leader, pilot, or key person will cause comparatively wide-spread disruption when compared to the death of a “rebel” since these are at most “organised” as loosely connected small “cells”. Even the destruction of an entire “cell” of rebels generally leaves the remaining cells undisturbed.
          • Literally any individual can be a potential threat to the enemy, from the 4’10” female barista at the local tavern to the 6’2″ veteran who willingly stays hidden in a hide for 3 days under a monetised foil blanket to avoid being seen by drones, just so he can place that shot at a valuable enemy target from 1000 yards away.
          • Even if not actively militant, the local populace can provide intelligence just as a result of their daily tasks and routines.
          • Disruption of important logistics can result in additional widespread chaos among the enemy troops and a corresponding lowering of morale.
          • Attacks of opportunity against the invaders are rife and will require extra security measures with corresponding drop in morale for the enemy and increase in hatred for them by the locals. A serviceman that goes to the bathroom in a local restaurant might get stabbed by another patron who follows him into the toilets before leaving quietly seconds later.
          • Disruption of local services can be easily accomplished and easily reinstated for the locals if required.
          • Civilians can infiltrate the enemy encampment, home country, and so on, and then pass on intelligence, or attack infrastructure and/or personnel deep behind enemy lines, with again, corresponding drop in morale.

        Regardless of the overall size and power of a foreign military, if the home team has endless staying power, as the Muslim Afghani or Quasi-buddhist Vietnamese, or Catholic Irish have, eventually, they will overcome and be victorious.

        You can see therefore, the deep importance of religions that go back thousands of years and that have been tested over millennia with regards to loyalty, faith and timeless reliability.

          Telling the Woke Commies Where to Go

          Coincidentally to my own piece on the lefty rapist types that are frenzy-whipped by the shrews in their life, Vox posted the response of a CEO of a comics publishing house to the suggestions that Chuck Dixon, an iconic comic book creator, should be deplatformed for… reasons. I have no idea. I don’t care at all. I read plenty of comic books as a teenager and earlier and the ones I liked best would probably get people jail time today.

          Jonah Hex was my favourite one of the I think they are silver age comics we used to have hundreds of before my dad got rid of them all after we left home. It’s why I don’t feel bad he helped me buy this farm. If he hadn’t chucked those out I probably would have been okay getting it on my own. Maybe ten years ago.

          Interestingly, DC also made a roleplaying game that my brother and I briefly owned and it had little cards for each of the DC heroes, that included a motivation for each one of them. Jonah Hex’s was correct: Seeking Justice. It’s why that character resonated with me so much. I think if I were reduced to a cardboard cutout that would be my primary motivation too. And as it was a Western, Jonah blasted a few bad guys per episode. The themes were quite adult and the writer of the stories was brilliant. Jonah Hex was discontinued and then they kind of did to him in real life what happens to him in the comic book. In a future he gets wormholes into, Jonah finds out his own body was embalmed as a circus attraction. Well, the subsequent restart attempts and the film made were kinda that. Whoever wrote those stories and film should be horse-whipped.

          Aaaaanny way, I digress, the point is the CEO of the publishing house producing the latest Chuck Dixon comic told the entire woke world to go pound sand. And then cry a bit and pound it a bit more.

          Good. And so should say all of us to every insane, retarded, Satanic, nonsense that is currently being peddled by the perennially offended. Common sense needs to prevail and courtesy and good manners be reserved for those who deserve it and earn it.

          To the screeching “social justice”, cultural marxist, types trying to convince your three year old son that he can become a girl or that your three year old daughter can become a boy, we should have a resounding: “Fuck right off, groomer!” ringing in their ears until they disappear back into whatever festering hellhole they climbed out of.

          And it should be loud and clear and backed up by legislation, and penalties, and consequences. These toxic excuses for “equality” in the name of “respect” and “fairness for all” are really evil. There is no other word for it. they intend to do harm and they do. The last thing they do is respect anyone, or try to be fair. They, in fact, are the very worst little tyrants, and everyone normal has had enough. So it’s time to put the mentally ill, the unbalanced, the insane, and the intentionally evil child predators back into proper health care, be that a mental institution, a home for the criminally insane, or being noted as a potentially unstable person that an eye should be kept on, for their own safety and that of others.

          And it starts with you. Be more Tyson Fury and less Danny Masterson.

          This is what you need to push back against.

            All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
            Website maintained by mindseed design