So, Who’s a Christian, Andrew?

Andrew Torba, owner and CEO of Gab, commenting on the recent Steven Crowder/Ben Shapiro/Candace Owen controlled opposition thing that anyone reading here should be familiar with by now, recently wrote a long post about how leaders of any kind should be Christians for anyone to essentially pay any attention to them.

I quote the most (only) relevant snippet below, but you can read the whole thing here.

We Need to Support Christian Leaders At Christian Media Companies. Period.

Last summer, I said that to be a leader or influencer on the right, you need to accept Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior and be a Christian. I said in no uncertain terms that people like Ben Shapiro and Jordan Peterson have no place in any serious right-wing movement and resistance to the Regime unless they become Christians. I got a lot of flack for this from the media and many people on the right, but I stand by it, and now you see why.

This Daily Wire situation with Crowder is a great example. Christians don’t act the way Ben Shapiro and Jeremy Boreing act. They don’t refer to themselves as “god-kings.” They don’t write soul-buying exploitative contracts. They don’t refer to employees as “wage slaves.” They don’t force people to throw their friends under the bus. These people don’t act like Christians because they aren’t Christians, and the Christians who do work for them and have made a deal with the Devil–people like Matt Walsh–should be ashamed of themselves. 

So, consider this blog post a kind of open letter to Andrew Torba, and pretty much every other Churchian of every denomination.

Before I begin, allow me to say that while Gab is not perfect, and neither is Torba, no one is, and while Gab might not be perfect, it certainly is a place that allows a level of freedom of expression that I haven’t found elsewhere since the early 90s and the days of Alt dot forums when the Internet was new.

Torba bans porn but lets pretty much any other view to be expressed. So all due credit must go to him for having created Gab. Some accuse him of being just another gatekeeper of sorts, or a sell out, but if so, I’d have to say in terms of a gatekeeper he would have to be the very last line of trying to allow a pressure valve that I don’t see as positive for the powers that be, because once you see the truth of certain lies, even if Gab where to disappear tomorrow, you can never unsee them. And Gab allows these truths to be presented.

But this post is not ultimately about Gab or even about Andrew Torba, I wish him great success in growing Gab, I am “picking on him” because he does have a voice and a loudspeaker and nominally is doing good work, so, when he makes a nonsensical statement that has no foundation, I notice and am going to point out the gaping and obvious flaws in his reasoning.

Axiom 1

There is ONE truth and it is identical for everyone, whether you know it or not, whether you see it or not, whether you even have the capacity or possibility to see it or not. If you do not understand and believe this, then there is really nothing further we need discuss. And if you are one of those “everyone has their own truth” retards, then run. Run away from here as fast as you can.

Axiom 2

God is real, exist and is indeed, Love. Yes he is also perfect justice, mercy, etc. etc, but in shorthand, Love defines Him best.

Axiom 3

God gave us free will, so we are free to disobey His will of what is best for us. However, if we are truly interested in the truth we will seek for it. And seek for it very deeply and truly, because literally nothing else is as important. And we are told, and reason and logic too indicate without a doubt, that if we do seek, indeed not only we should, but we must find this truth. Why? Well because if God is Good (Love) and the truth is one, then God will make it so if you care to, you can find that truth.

Axiom 4

A loving God that makes it so you can find that ultimate truth if only you honestly seek for it, would not leave such a truth to be in doubt, open to personal interpretation, available to only a few select individuals, and so on. In short, He would, naturally and logically, set things up so that:

A) The truth should be self-evident if one but cares to observe things honestly and openly.

B) Given we are made in His image, it is logical to think that the divine spark must exist within every one of us at least as a potential for us to connect with it and therefore want to seek the truth as well as be able to recognise it when we do.

C) Despite the utterly flawed human nature of human beings, that truth remains infallible, incorruptible and visible to any who seek it, regardless of circumstance. Which is not to say it might not be easier for some to see than others, but the possibility exists for all. But the point here is that the infallibility of the One truth relating to God and His will must be infallible, for it is the very foundation of the entirety of creation. It cannot therefore be flawed, or open to individual human interpretation other than as error.

So, in conclusion of the above axioms, in some supernatural, God-protected way, this truth must be all of these things:

1) Discoverable

2) Infallible

3) Protected from error despite humans

That’s at a minimum.

We would also, naturally and logically, assume that such truth, if followed, would lead to the best possible life and situations for those people who do act according to it.

Now, of all the world religions, only Christianity fulfils all of these requirements.

And we are even specifically told in our Holy Book, that:

1) the truth is self evident all around us

2) if we but seek, we shall find it

3) it is infallible and immutable

4) God will be with us in this truth right up to the end

We are also told a few other things that are pretty relevant:

A) most people will not follow this truth which is on a hard and narrow path, but will instead follow the wide road to Hell.

B) at the end only a tiny remnant of believers will hold out. The rest will all be fooled or stop believing.

Now, given all of the above, it is absolutely clear that only Catholicism can properly be seen to be Christianity. It fulfils all of the minimum requirements outlined above and indeed has the fruits to demonstrate beyond a doubt that those people who followed Catholic principles created the best art, the best architecture, overcame vice and human flaws better than any other civilisation, invented the (real) scientific method as well as most modern hard sciences, civilised mass-murdering savages around the globe, created the best environment for the nuclear family ever devised by humanity, and produced the greatest thinkers with a humane nature in the largest number ever, of any other religion.

These are simply the facts.

You might not like them, but it is the truth, objectively speaking.

Certainly, we cannot assume anyone pushing or agreeing with the LGBT agenda, or trannie children (or adults for that matter) or abortion, or divorce, or contraception has the interests of human beings at heart. And yet Protestantism was how these ideas became “acceptable” for “christians” to have.

Of course, any objective observer would immediately point out that “catholicism” is replete with pederasts, homosexuals and perverse satanists of the worst kind.

And they would be right. Because Bergoglio, the Vatican and so on are NOT Catholic. They are the skinsuit of Catholicism being worn by the assassins, impostors, frauds and all-round freemasonic satanists that have subverted it and taken it over.

You see, the Catholic Church was under constant attack from the start, and it certainly had bad men and bad priests and bad bishops and bad Popes in it. Yet… despite this, it also created and compiled and grew the INFALLIBLE magisterium of the Church.

What is that you say?

It is the actual rules of Christianity. The rules which any good Christian should and will follow.

Well, where are these rules you say? The Bible?

Well, not quite. Yes the Bible has the Truth in it. But the Bible alone is not enough. If it were, the Bible itself would have been put together by Jesus Himself. And not by a conclave of bishops some 300 years after Jesus ascended to Heaven before a crowd of hundreds. It took tradition, and even oral as well as written history, to compile the Bible. And those wise bishops, who had been trained by the Apostles and then by those they trained and so on, decided on what was to be in the Bible and what was not to be in it.

Infallibly.

And their spiritual descendants, through legitimate apostolic succession, passed down and refined the self-evident yet deep truths found in the Bible as well as tradition.

Over 2000 years these added up to many, many, many documents, and is what priests and Bishops, in part, where trained to know and refer to when instructing the lay people.

But from about the mid 1700s or so, a new assault on the Church began in earnest. A patient, insidious evil, and by the late 1800s these Jewish inspired Satanists had made serious inroads and infiltrations into the Church. Therefore, Pope Pious X, at the turn of the century, ordered that all of these thousands of documents be reviewed and their essence compiled into one, homogeneous, monolithic document of all the infallible dogma of the Catholic Church. He set up a commission of Bishops and Cardinals to do this, headed by Cardinal Pietro Gasparri, who, with his team, examined tens of thousands of documents in order to create the Code of Canon Law of 1917.

Pope Pious X died before it was finished, but his successor, Pope Benedict the XV (not to be confused with Ratzinger, the antipope that recently died) completed it.

After publication there was another period lasting until the death of the last valid Pope in the current era, Pope Pious XII in 1958, during which any cleric or academic could question or ask about this code, in case there was any contradiction between a rule previously stated, from centuries earlier sometimes, and more recent papal encyclicals, and so on.

So from 1917 to 1958 the Code of Canon Law was scrutinised, and in the whole of that time precisely ONE change was made to part 2 of code 1099. A very minor change, and that by Pope Pious XII himself.

In short, this document, which encompasses the entirety of Catholic rules and dogma, both divine (and therefore eternal) as well as ecclesiastical (and therefore mutable under certain situations) is the most vetted document on Earth and represents the infallible magisterium of the Catholic Church.

Now, according to that document, every “Pope” after Pious XII has disqualified themselves from being Catholic. And hence being valid clergy. Because they publicly promoted heresy. That is, ideas, concepts and behaviours that go directly counter to Catholic infallible truth.

Anyone who does this is automatically no longer part of the Catholic Church and as such is not able to act in any way on its behalf. This simple, obvious rule, which is clear even to a child, is encompassed in Code 188 part 4. Which is a summary of the Papal encyclical of Pope Paul IV, Cum ex Apostolato Officio, and essentially says that anyone who publicly defects from the faith by word, action or deed, loses any office they may have had in the Church. No ifs, ands or buts. No recourse, no, appeal, no pronouncement by anyone required. Because ultimately it is obvious.

Otherwise one would be in the absurd position (which many satanic fake “priests” try to push, absurdly!) where a priest that sacrifices babies on the altar during mass would have to still be “respected” as valid clergy until some “official” pronouncement is made by his fellow fake clerics. Clearly nonsense.

Just as if you try to play basketball using a golf club, you are thrown off the court, so the same here. Act as a heretic publicly and notoriously, or promote heresy publicly and notoriously, and you’re immediately a heretic. No one needs say anything officially. It’s obvious to anyone who actually IS Catholic that you are not.

Now, since 15 of the 16 documents of Vatican 2 have direct and obvious heresy in them, and are documents intended for the entire world, you can’t become more public a heretic than by promoting their content, which all fake Novus Ordo “clergy” do and have done for over 60 years. Meaning they are not Catholics and not valid clergy. In fact, they are not even validly ordained, so they are not clergy of any kind, except maybe as some kind of priest of Moloch or Beelzebub or some other other demon.

The only people who still follow the real Catholic rules of the Church, as present in the Code of Canon Law of 1917, are Sedevacantist Catholics.

And since there is only ONE truth, they are not just the only Catholics, but the only Christians.

The statement that the Catholic Church has always said —in its abbreviated form: outside of the Catholic Church, there is no salvation— is simply common sense.

If 2+2=4, anyone who says otherwise clearly is outside of the Truth.

Protestants don’t have any set of rules written down as to how you can even tell if someone is a Christian or not. And if one sect does, there are at least another 40,000 sects disagreeing with that version (yes it’s a real number, not hyperbole.)

Their standard for being a “christian” is literally to recognised Jesus is King.

Well, even demons know that.

If that’s the sum total of your “rules” then it’s obvious that literally even demons can be, and invariably will be, part of your club.

The truth is often jarring. Sometimes even painful.

And the last three years should make you aware of that; but the truth is always preferable to a lie.

So… if even considering actual Catholicism upsets you, then I suggest you take a good long hard look at it. I did. I didn’t start out Catholic. In fact I assumed Catholicism was one of the worst fake religions out there.

And that’s because what I thought was Catholicism was the fake Church that has usurped the Vatican since 28th October 1958.

But when I studied things, I realised that this was not Catholicism at all.

I wasn’t lazy about it you see.

I actually DID seek. And I did so relentlessly. The only thing I could not falsify, was Catholicism. The real one.

The one that led men to Jerusalem in 1095.

The one the knights of Malta had in 1565.

The one that the authors of the Catechism of Trent had.

What I did manage to falsify was Protestantism in all its forms, which was childishly simple, Eastern “Orthodoxy” which was a lot closer to the truth than Protestantism, but still far off, and of course, almost all of my preconceived ideas and “deep thoughts”.

What I could not find fault with was the Code of Canon Law of 1917. That is: Catholicism.

So I got baptised by a real priest (all Novus Ordo “clergy” are impostors) and became a real Catholic, which are known as sedvacantists today.

We have a very clear set of rules that have produced the best fruits humanity has seen in 2000 years. They are written down. Anyone who cares to can find them and read them.

And it is childishly simple to spot impostors and gatekeepers once you know the truth.

The Milos, and the Emo Jones, and the Taylor Marshalls, and Gary Vorises, and Bergoglios, and Ratzingers, and Woitjlas, and Roncallis, and Montinis, and “Father” Rippergers, and on, and on, and on, and all their retinues of demonic imps, are obvious fake “Catholics” trying very hard and often succeeding to lead especially young men down a neutered and castrated road of submission to evil.

And the Joel Osteens, and other fake “Christians”, like Candace Owen, and Steven Crowder, and so on, and never mind the literal enemies of Christ like the Ben Shapiros and the Jordan Petersons of the world, are actually comical in their attempts at subversion.

But it is not them I write this for.

It is for you. The Andrew Torbas of the world.

Who, if I take at face value, profess to be Christians, but have no objective standards for neither proving nor convincing anyone you actually are.

And regardless of your possibly earnest belief that you are, you have no tried and tested historical results of a positive nature you can point to. In fact, quite the opposite. It was Protestantism that allowed contraception, then divorce, then abortion, the LGBT-Pedo and on and on and on. The slow secularisation of Christianity began with Protestantism. In fact, even the fake, demonic Bergoglian “Catholic” Church, thanks to the momentum of real Catholicism, despite having subverted even the Papacy over 60 years ago, still can’t fully approve of even divorce, never mind contraception or abortion.

It might hurt you, your pride, the memory of people you loved, who taught you lies in good faith, thinking they were doing good instead, but facing the truth means facing these things.

Catholicism is not a religion for spoilt children. It is a religion for people able to face reality and deal with it accordingly.

And if you think Catholicism is all about accepting rapefugees, turning the other cheek, and funding Soros’ open society, think again.

Read the Crusades by Harold Lamb or the Great Siege by Ernle Bradford. Catholicism is more likely to be about firing the heads of your enemies out of cannons as a response to their attempted invasion of your lands than being some cucked version of boomer inspired “love generation”.

So.

To sum up, and just in case Andrew ever bothers to actually read this:

Who is an actual Christian, Andrew?

And how do you tell?

Because by my measure, you’re not one yet. Regardless of what you might erroneously believe.

Those of you who may want to delve deeper into this and save yourselves some time are invited to click on the top left on “books I wrote” and pick up Believe! If you can only muster a couple of hours of reading, or Reclaiming the Catholic Church if you can read a whole 530 pages worth of details replete with impeccable references.

If Andrew ever replies I’ll be sure to link to his response or publish it here.

To all you Andrew Tate supporters and believers. I’ll bet as many of you as I can, $10 each, that Andrew Tate will get prison time.

Happy to set it up with a third party in escrow if enough of you show up to make it worthwhile. If you’re willing to take me up on it let me know or comment below and let’s put our money where our mouth is.

The first Bible I started to read when I began to investigate Christianity was a small portable KJV. I was travelling a lot for work, between London in UK, Venice in Italy and Astana in Kazakhstan. The small Bible was convenient as it fit in my pocket and I could read it on the planes.

But at the same time I had begin to investigate Protestantism, Orthodoxy and Catholicism, as well as the various claims from one group against the other. It became clear early on that the DR Bible was a far superior version, though it needs a little help from the Septuagint too.

The KJV on the other hand was a Bible ordered by a flamingly homosexual King who literally started the freemasonic temples in their current Satanic worship mode.

Below is a non-exhaustive list of “mistranslation” all designed to reduce both Jesus, the truth of the magisterium of the Catholic Church and especially to sideline Mary to a secularised version of events that, in die course, would inevitably lead to the Joel Osteen version of the “gospel”.

With thanks to one Mark Wilkinson for posting it Faceborg.

WHY DOESN’T THE CATHOLIC CHURCH SANCTION THE KING JAMES VERSION TRANSLATION OF THE BIBLE?

Some Examples of Subtle Differences Between the Douay-Rheims [DR] Holy Bible and the King James Version [KJV] that Make a Real Difference!

(Edited by Mark Wilkinson, B.A., M.Th.S.)

Briefly, the Catholic Church does not accept the King James Version/Authorized Version for the same reason that it does not accept as authoritative any Bible containing only the protocanon [only 66 books in total], or containing the deuterocanon only in a separate appendix under the description of the term “Apocrypha” [meaning “hidden” or “obscure” books].

Bibles fitting this description display an understanding of Sacred Scripture very different from the Catholic understanding. This makes it likely that the translation will not be in accord with Catholic teachings. Since this could result in misunderstandings of Catholic teaching, the Church does not use them for liturgical functions, and does not endorse them for devotional use. They may, however, be studied as literary works, or as exercises in comparative translation.

In order for a Bible translation, or any other book, to be considered acceptable or to be considered “Catholic,” it needs to have an imprimatur from the local bishop. The website of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops contains a list of Bible translations approved for devotional use; it recommends any translation with an imprimatur. Other Bibles are all “Un-Authorized,” because the Catholic Church is not interested in approving Protestant translations of an abridged [reduced] Bible.

During the Reformation Era, King Henry VIII of England decided (for seemingly illicit reasons) that he was going to leave the Catholic Church and appoint himself as the head of the Church of England.

The history of England’s monarchy gets pretty messy here, but King Henry VIII died ~1547 and King James I came to power in ~1603.

Now that the Church of England was officially separated from the Catholic Church, and King James of England was the “head” of the Church of England, he was the one who “authorized” requests for new Bible translations.

The King gave his approval and then they made the King James Version (KJV), also known as the “Authorized” translation.

The whole point of this history is that the Catholic Church did not really accept the King James Version, because it was never their Bible and it was translated against their wishes, under an opposing King.

Below are some comparisons of the Douay-Rheims Bible with the King James Bible, and a summary of their significance. In each case, I have put the Douay-Rheims (DR) verse first, followed by the King James Version (KJV). Many of the differences are very subtle.

The words of significant difference between the two parallel verses have been capitalized for emphasis.

The point of making the differences subtle is always the same. A small divergence from truth is all you need to lead souls to hell. Imagine what math would become like is you only accept a “small” change like agreeing that 2+2 = 4.00001. I mean… how could it possibly matter, right? Well, accept such nonsense and in a few decades you can say goodbye to civilisation, including everything from satellites to air travel. Same thing here. Give it 500 years and now the Protties have transgender “bishops” and abortion on demand.

THE HOLY MASS AND THE PRIESTHOOD

*Genesis 14:18

[DR] “But Melchisedech, the king of Salem, brought forth bread and wine, FOR he was the priest of the most high God.”

[KJV] “And Melchizedek, king of Salem, brought forth bread and wine: AND he was the priest of the most high God.”

Here, the DRV shows bread and wine as intrinsic to Melchisedech’s priesthood, whereas the KJV suggests the fact Melchisedech was a priest, and the fact he brought forth bread and wine, are two possibly unrelated facts.

*1 Corinthians 11:27

[DR] “Therefore, whosoever shall eat this bread, OR drink the chalice of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and of the blood of the Lord.”

[KJV] “Wherefore, whosoever shall eat this bread, AND drink this cup of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.”

The difference here is that Protestants receive both the bread and wine, whereas Catholics generally receive only the bread (communion in one kind only). The different translations of this verse seem to reflect this difference in practice.

*Jeremiah 11:19

[DR] “And I was as a meek LAMB, that is carried to be a VICTIM: and I knew not that they had devised counsels against me, saying: Let us put WOOD on his BREAD, and cut him off from the land of the living, and let his name be remembered no more.”

[KJV] “But I was like a LAMB or an OX that is brought to the SLAUGHTER; and I knew not that they had devised devices against me, saying, Let us destroy the TREE with the FRUIT thereof, and let us cut him off from the land of the living, that his name may be no more remembered.”

This verse was interpreted by Jerome as a Eucharistic prophecy of the Crucifixion in which Christ’s body is referred to as “bread.” The Protestant translation, by referring to “fruit” rather than “bread,” negates this interpretation.

This also puts the lie to the “Orthodox” position that if you only take the bread it is not a “proper” mass. But then, like the protestants, we know the “orthodox” also don’t read their Bible. Not the correctly translated versions anyway.

PENANCE

*Luke 3:3

[DR] “…preaching the baptism of PENANCE for the remission of sins.”

[KJV] “…preaching the baptism of REPENTANCE for the remission of sins.”

*Acts 2:38

[DR] “Peter said to them: Do PENANCE, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ.”

[KJV] “Peter said unto them, REPENT, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ.”

In these two verses, one referring to the message of John the Baptist and the other to the events of the first Whitsun, the Catholic Bible has penance while the Protestant one only has repentance.

This also plays into the retarded Prottie idea that not only “once saved always saved”, but also, “no works!” It is, of course, idiotic to think you can just say a nominal “I’m a Jesus follower!” And literally need do nothing more to secure your place in Heaven. You have this kind of secularisation of principles to thank for the perennial slide to hell that protestantism inevitably leads to.

MARY

*Luke 1:28

[DR] “And the angel being come in, said unto her: Hail, FULL OF GRACE, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women.”

[KJV] “And the angel came in unto her, and said, Hail, thou that art HIGHLY FAVOURED, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women.”

There is at least a difference in degree between being full of grace and being highly favored.

This of course also goes to the Hail Mary prayer, which, unlike the Prottie lies about “worshipping Mary” is simply asking for Mary’s intercession and prayer for us sinners, and where being “full of Grace” is not just a set of meaningless words. And of course, the difference between “full of (God’s) Grace” and being “highly favoured” is absolutely massive.

LIMBUS PATRUM (Limbo of the Fathers)

*Genesis 42:38

[DR] “You will bring down my gray hairs with sorrow to HELL [Sheol].”

[KJV] “Then shall ye bring down my gray hairs with sorrow to the GRAVE.”

Here, Jacob is fretting about what will happen to him if he allows Benjamin to travel to Egypt and he does not come back. According to the DRV, he expects, on death, his soul will go to hell, whereas according to the KJV, he is talking about the burial of his body. There are several other verses similar to this one.

Prottie secular semi-denial of Hell and how and why you can end up there being very much glossed over is a recurring theme.

PAPACY

*Malachi 2:7

[DR] “For the lips of the priest SHALL keep knowledge, and they SHALL seek the law at his mouth: because he is the angel [messenger] of the Lord of hosts.

[KJV] For the priest’s lips SHOULD keep knowledge, and they SHOULD seek the law at his mouth: for he is the messenger of the LORD of hosts.”

An interpretation of this verse is that it is a prophecy of the Papacy. The DRV says what “shall” happen, a definite statement about the future. The KJV says what “should” happen, but with no guarantee that it will.

Hot take: Prottie conmen approved by KJV under their general theology of: “eh… it happens.”

ROYAL SUPREMACY

*1 Peter 2:13

[DR] “Be ye subject therefore to every human CREATURE for God’s sake: whether it be to the king as EXCELLING; Or to governors.…”

[KJV] “Submit yourselves to every ORDINANCE of man for the Lord’s sake: whether it be to the king, as SUPREME; Or unto governors.…”

Here, the DRV describes the king as “excelling,” but the KJV asserts that he is “supreme.” Not all Protestants believe in Royal Supremacy, but the Church of England does, and King James certainly did (as, indeed, so did several Catholic monarchs). The Catholic Church regarded the Pope as supreme.

This is another very important distinction that most will not grasp the extent of.

In Catholic thought, it is assumed if a man is King it is because God ordained it so to some extent or other, however, and this is important, the onus to be a GOOD and CATHOLIC king is on the man himself, and his subjects are to generally give him his due and even the benefit of the doubt when possible, but are absolutely under no obligation to do so when he reveals himself to act improperly. And should he act as a public heretic, then all bets are off.

Instead, in obvious fashion, flaming king Jimmy, wanted everyone to bow to his wishes no matter what. Reminds you of the LGBT-Pedo lobby today, doesn’t it?

PRIESTS

*1 Timothy 4:14

[DR] “Neglect not the GRACE that is in thee, which was given thee by prophesy, with imposition of the hands of the PRIESTHOOD.”

[KJV] “Neglect not the GIFT that is in thee, which was given thee by prophecy, with the laying on of the hands of the PRESBYTERY.”

*Acts 14:23

[DR] “And when they had ordained to them PRIESTS in every church, and had prayed with fasting, they commended them to the Lord, in whom they believed.”

[KJV] “And when they had ordained them ELDERS in every church, and had prayed with fasting, they commended them to the Lord, on whom they believed.”

The DRV refers to Christian priests being ordained by Paul and Barnabas, whereas the KJV calls them elders. The DRV refers specifically to ordination conferring grace, which the KJV terms a gift, which may reflect a more sacramental understanding of ordination in the Catholic Church. There are several other verses where the DRV says “priest” and the KJV has “elder.” The KJV also has “overseer” in some of the places where the DRV has “bishop,” although the KJV does also refer to bishops (e.g., 1 Timothy 3:1).

Obviously if you’re setting things up so any old Tom, Dick and Harry can set himself up as a “pastor” and earn his living preaching whatever interpretation he wants of the Bible, then, having a sacramental process to authorise priests and Bishops would cramp your style.

SALVATION BY FAITH

*Luke 18:42

[DR] “And Jesus said to him: Receive thy sight: thy FAITH hath MADE thee WHOLE.”

[KJV] “And Jesus said unto him, Receive thy sight: thy FAITH hath SAVED thee.”

The DRV has Jesus talking of physical healing, whereas the KJV suggests salvation, as a result of faith. The KJV translation of this verse is an obvious example of Protestant bias, based on their belief in the false doctrine of salvation through “sola fide” (faith alone).

Self-explanatory false teaching of Protties.

So… while I still have my copy of the portable KJV, it has laid unopened for years. And it will remain so.

Keep in mind the examples above are just a few of the 33,000 “mistranslations” the KJV is replete with.

Of course, the KJV zealots will continue to “defend” their LGBT Bible that is also literally known as the Freemason Bible, but anyone rational should at this point understand it is a Satanic piece of misinformation and to be avoided at all costs.

So the Russian Federation is stating openly that in the village of Karaichnoe, in the Kharkov region, the special forces of Ukraine are planting mines in the grain deposit. The aim there to blow it up and blame the Russians for yet another “barbarous attack” of the “monstrous Russians” which would produce famine and break the accord in place for the distribution of grain both within and without Ukraine.

They go so far as to physically name not only the location of the deposit, but also the specific individuals involved:

⚡️🇷🇺 Comunicato urgente dall’Unità di coordinamento interministeriale della Federazione Russa per la risposta umanitaria in Ucraina

◽️ Il Servizio per la Sicurezza Ucraina sta preparando una provocazione su larga scala al fine di screditare le politiche della Federazione Russa nell’ambito del cosiddetto “Accordo sul grano”, imputandole così la causa di un “deficit alimentare” in Ucraina.

◽️ Nel villaggio Karaichnoe, sito nella regione di Kharkov, i Servizi Segreti ucraini stanno posizionando mine nel deposito locale del grano. Dopo un attentato programmato, l’Ucraina accuserà la Federazione Russa di aver “deliberatamente eliminato le scorte di grano in Ucraina”, provocando “carestie” e “mettendo fine” così all’Accordo sul grano. Sui media occidentali l’incidente verrà presentato come ennesima “atrocità dei militari russi” che richiede una “reazione immediata e dura da parte della comunità internazionale”.

◽️ Per preparare il suddetto atto terroristico, un gruppo di circa 30 persone, composto da esperti del genio militare e da agenti dei Servizi Segreti, è appena giunto a Volchansk, nella regione di Kharkov.

◽️ Il deposito del grano appartiene a un certo V.Uvarov, collaboratore dei Servizi per la Sicurezza dell’Ucraina. È anche nota l’identità del capogruppo, A.Tkachuk, e di altri membri del gruppo, nonché si conosce la loro dislocazione attuale, ovvero presso il Distretto di Reclutamento di Volchansk, in via Volodarskogo 29.

◽️ In seguito a una lunga serie d’insuccessi delle Forze Armate Ucraine e alla vigilia del summit dei Ministri della Difesa dei Paesi NATO a Ramstein (Germania), previsto il 20 gennaio 2023, con queste eclatanti provocazioni, le autorità di Kiev stanno cercando di accrescere la pressione sull’opinione pubblica occidentale, al fine di ottenere nuove massicce forniture di armamenti moderni e di mezzi militari all’Esercito Ucraino.

In English:

⚡️🇷🇺 Urgent communiqué from the Interministerial Coordination Unit of the Russian Federation for the Humanitarian Response in Ukraine The Ukrainian Security Service is preparing a large-scale provocation in order to discredit the policies of the Russian Federation within the framework of the so-called “Wheat Agreement”, thus blaming it for a “food deficit” in Ukraine ◽️.

◽️ In the village Karaichnoe, Located in the Kharkov region, the Ukrainian Secret Service is placing mines in the local grain depot. After a planned attack, Ukraine will accuse the Russian Federation of “deliberately eliminating grain stocks in Ukraine”, causing “famine” and thus “ending” the Wheat Agreement. In the Western media, the incident will be presented as yet another “Russian military atrocity” that requires an “immediate and harsh reaction from the international community”.

◽️ To prepare the aforementioned terrorist act, a group of about 30 people composed of experts in the military engineering and agents of the Secret Service, he has just arrived in Volchansk, in the Kharkov region.

◽️ The grain depot belongs to a certain V.Uvarov, a collaborator of the Security Services of Ukraine. The identity of the group leader, A.Tkachuk, and other members of the group is also known, as well as their current location, namely at the Volkswagen Recruitment District, Volodarskogo Street 29.

◽️ Following a long series of failures of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and on the eve of the summit of the Defense Ministers of NATO countries in Ramstein (Germany), scheduled for January 20, 2023, with these striking provocations, the Kiev authorities are trying to increase the pressure on Western public opinion, in order to obtain new massive supplies of modern armaments and military means to the Ukrainian Army.

 

I dunno about you, but I wouldn’t want to be V. Uvarov or A. Tackachuk for all the grain in Ukraine right now.

And I don’t even think the Russkies will do them in. I think the Ukis probably will.

 

Vox day on his blog posted a link to this statement that was published on anonymous conservative’s blog and now is archived by yours truly here.

In summary the statement says that the author had a meet with one of the elites that informed him that The Plan ™ was to have everyone turn against their governments so they would wipe them out, and then basically have everyone go full Mad Max for a while before they swoop in and take over as the new “benign” one world government after everyone has suffered enough in the burnt landscape of early gamma world.

You really need to read the thing at the link before I explain why I think it is, in order of likelihood:

1. Complete bullshit

2. The beginning of a ploy by the guilty to try and get people to go “oh no… so you’re a victim too! Ok then, we won’t string you up from the nearest lamppost!”

3. Actually the plan of the “elite” but, as usual, has the coherence and likelihood of success of the plans of a retard. At least as far as concerns me and anyone with an IQ above room temperature (in the coming ice age).

So… go away and read the post at the link above, then return here and let me count the ways and the reasons why I think this is nonsense. Starting from least relevant to most relevant, here are my points:

The superficial reasons

1. The mysterious billionaire who shares his wisdom with a lucky but also skilful “normal man” is indeed a trope of all pulp stories of this kind. At first glance this would seem to be precisely one of these fantastic tales. However, having worked for billionaires and millionaires myself, as well as some actual wealthy criminals too, and having had presidents, confirmed CIA agents, and various other interesting characters at out family dinner table, I can tell you that actually, this is a trope because, like clichés, it has a basis in truth. It does and can happen.

Even if the “elite” think of themselves as above and beyond the unwashed masses, the reality is that often their education and IQ is no more than the +2SD of most successful people. And the incidence of +3 and +4 SD (145 to 160 IQ) is no more prevalent among them than it is among the readers of this blog. And when it is, they often have their inevitable autistic traits run far wilder than they do in people without access to unlimited resources. Think Howard Hughes level of craziness.

In other words, despite their billions and unique life experiences, their wetware still functions like the rest of us. And when they are in the company of a competent “peasant class” they can and do speak quite freely.

So, counter-intuitively to most people that even notice the trope/cliché, I would place the likelihood of it being possible at at least 50%. In other words, it’s a coin toss and has no bearing on the probability of the story being true or false.

2. Some of the baseline premises are way off even if based on verifiable events.

For example, I have shown previously how the vaxx had to have been manufactured at least several years prior to covid 19, and that has in any case been confirmed not just mathematically, as I did, but with some actual documentation since, so, it is true that the plan has been in place for a while.

However… it is not true that the vaxx uptake has been “fantastic”. It has, unfortunately, been very high in the first world. But I assure you, it is not at all successful in the very hotspots of human reproduction that you’d think globalists would be most concerned by. There is a post in the works on this that I need to spend some time on to show the figures on, it’s been half done for well over a month. I’ll get to it eventually, but the point is that the people who will mostly die out as a result of the vaxx are white caucasians in the first world, that is Europe, the Americas, and Eurasia, with Australia and new Zealand thrown in in a very big way too. So the “elite” would have wiped out the most the very people able to keep indoor plumbing and electric lights on, and left alive an overwhelming majority of third worlders, who are not exactly known for their temperate behaviours when things get ugly.

3. So… the media, governments and public figures who promoted the vaxx will be hunted in the street eh? Ok, fine. And do they think the Soros and Bill Gates of the world will just be quietly ignored? Seriously, there are a majority of people on the planet by now that are aware of these supposed “elite” and their involvement in the whole plandemic. Oh but they have private armies! Yeah… tell me… how did the US government, supposedly the most powerful military on Earth (well, aside from the Russians, but we’ll keep that just between you and me), do against third worlders armed with improvised explosive devices and a bunch of AK-47s? Oh, that was a one off in Afghanistan eh? Right. Well, ok, a two-fer with Vietnam and those punji stick armed guys in pijamas. Well, ok, three times lucky with that embassy where the guys in it had upset Hillary. I mean America always won everything because of its vastly superior technology and military might. Ok, except for that standstill in Korea. Or against that superpower, Cuba, but otherwise… yeah. You get the idea. If civilisation actually collapses, the melonheads are not going to fare too well, bunkers or not.

The more serious reasons

Allright. Let’s take it all at face value, and let’s say it pretty much works out as the “elite” want and every country on Earth falls into anarchy and the hanging of all governments from lampposts really happens.

—side note— If that actually happened it would be perfectly fine with me, by the way, as far as I can tell, pretty much all politicians and their corrupt courts deserve it, and if we can get all the intelligence services thrown in for free that would be a triple whammy win from where I’m sitting. —end of side note—

How long do you think the anarchy would last?

Months? Years? Decades?

It wouldn’t last long at all. And it would be geography based and factions would arise almost instantly. In fact, by the time a mob is organised enough to string up politicians, you can be sure someone is already directing that mob. Ok, sure, let’s say almost all such mobs are in reality directed by mind-altering technology (yes it exists, and yes it’s been tested, and yes it does work) just to get rid of the governments but then the switch is thrown back down. The rabid mob returns from its microwave induced murderous trance into shocked and shameful compliance. Still… how long before local warlords of one sort or another rise up?

Days. At the local level. Weeks or months or if you’re lucky a year or two tops at the regional level. And if they are any good they will form armed militias as their top priority. Sure, some, most in fact, will fail, but why and how is multifaceted and a lot of them will fail simply because they will be organically absorbed by whatever the most brutal enforcers in the area are.

So you’re one of the “elite” with your private army and your bunker and your crowd-control technology safely embedded in your private fleet of jets, helicopters and armoured vehicles. Great. Maybe you and your five other “elite” buddies can take over New Zealand. And have at it, no one likes the Aussies and the Kiwis anyway. Keep them.

But now you’re going to try to coalesce the remainder of the planet’s survivors. Which, let me remind you, have survived the Vaxx mandates, their own police state, in fact they hung all the previous tyrannical governors from lampposts, then they survived food scarcity, weather-controlled droughts and floods, they survived your crowd-control mass psychosis technology, actual old style pestilence, and their fellow mad max survivors. And possibly the sudden pole shift that might take place along with earthquakes and tsunamis and maybe even an asteroid impact or two (small ones).

But now, now that they have survived all that, they will hand over their sawn off shotguns, pet dogs and 4×4 trucks with welded on armour to you, the immaculately dressed and well-fed from organic New Zealand sheep “elite”. And they will do it for a basic universal income, bio-tagging, maggot and cricket pies, video games and the handing over of their first-borns to your sex orgies.

Right. Methinks you have miscalculated yet again, melon heads.

You’ll be dealing with multiple city-state sized problems (I predicted the return of city states and zealous religion over a decade ago) of men armed to the teeth (regardless of what gun control nonsense you manage to push for in the next few years before the collapse) who have shown a Darwinian ability to overcome you can only imagine in the most over the top pedowood production. And they will be scattered all around the globe, and your high tech advantage is not going to help you as much as you think. Especially the longer this all takes as things break down, your loyal servants begin to fail too, turn on you, go native, or simply die and their expertise is lost and with it the degeneration of your high tech (which is invariably fragile) begins a fast slide to the bottom. And at the bottom Bob the builder is waiting for you. With a brick. And Bob has survived the riots, the vaxx, the hunger, the pestilence, the death of his children and wife, and now Bob has you in front of him. It’s you, Bob and his brick. Good luck, melon-head.

Oh, and there is no replacing your loyal servants anymore. You killed off the vast majority of the race that had the best chance of retaining the high tech. Any of those guys left in the wild now probably have a harem and lots of .50 calibre machine guns mounted on the back of all the pickups their lieutenants drive around.

So, good luck subjugating all those enclaves.

Eventually those enclaves will coalesce to some degree or other and proper city states and maybe even small nations will form in due course, if enough people are left to form them. And maybe, if you mind your own business and stay quietly in New Zealand in your bunker, rationing out the sheep meat for both food and your sexual proclivities, you might live out your natural life span without meeting Bob.

Maybe, you’ll even retain a considerable technological advantage against the proto-nations forming around the globe, and eventually be able to infiltrate and subjugate them to fall, once again, under your economic control. But not all will submit, and if any with a brain are left, at the first mention of usury or fiat money you will be thrown in the pit where the mutants fight to the death in order to eat each other and as entertainment for the citizens of the Thunderdome.

Lastly… while there IS an affinity between billionaire pedophiles, and no one can deny that, I guarantee that the backstabbing, contempt, one-upmanship, and murderous intent these “people” have towards each other is second to none. So, yeah… none of their plans will go quite as smoothly as they may have thought.

And one really last point.

I know from personal experience that it is exceedingly rare that these so-called “elite” ever really experience the pure joy of life that many in the plebeian classes of “eaters” they so despise experience even now, on a regular basis, despite the dystopian shitfest we are currently inhabiting. These people by and large never have been hungry, cold or uncomfortable other than by their own choice and in a perfectly controlled setting. If they did experience “hardship”, it was in conditions of essentially studio-controlled Trueman-show like quality, where their discomfort could end as soon as they wanted.

It’s the difference between being on the set of naked an afraid, where when you had enough of the preset challenge you can tap out and you are immediately whisked away in a helicopter with all the latest technology, and being lost in the jungle with only a knife, thousands of miles from any civilisation and literally no one knowing you even exist.

These people don’t cope well with uncontrolled and uncontrollable and unforeseen conditions.

So, even if it really all is exactly as that anonymous elite supposedly told the anonymous anon in that text, well, I’ll be fine, and so will most people like me.

And those of a more “natural” nature who actually lose loved ones? Yeahhh… I’m just not seeing them taking your basic income and cricket meals-on-wheels very seriously an option when compared to skinning you alive and rolling you in salt before setting you on fire.