As a result of my stream on Demonic Oppression, I received an email from a reader. He mentioned how I discussed the indoctrination of gullible people to the tune of a few thousand souls listening in hypnotic brainwash mode, to a charlatan on stage essentially doing a show. And he sent me a link to this monstrosity of “preaching”. I dare you to be able to listen to more than two or three minutes without the cringe factor making you shrivel in embarrassment for everyone involved.
Now, go to the man’s wikipedia page and you’ll note that, oh, yeah, he’s done quite well for himself.
There is a long list of accomplishments in humanitarian efforts, and so on. And even if only half are true, it would still be a great achievement, no doubt.
There is, of course, a little trouble with the IRS, due to his involvement in politics, but I’m not one to blame someone for running foul of the IRS. Since it can literally happen to you even if you do everything right, as I have found out from personal American friends.
So, all in all, you might say, oh well, he’s a walking cliché, cringy and probably skimming some cash for himself, but hey, at least he’s doing some good.
And that’s fine as far as it goes.
I just can’t for the life of me imagine doing that sort of thing, play-acting that way. I have no idea how such people shave in the morning, what with needing a mirror to do it and such.
And yet, that is the way of the world. And tell me, wayfaring stranger, is THAT your religion? Is THAT your Christianity? Is that the reverence to God and Jesus you want to see in your priest?
I’m just curious.
How can someone who believes in infallibility of popes speak against “churchianity”? “he’s done quite well for himself” is on the tombstone of every pope as with all other false teachers. Benny Hinn in a mitre with an Italian accent is still Binny Hinn.
Gary, you’ve become a teaching moment, before you are relegated to the spam pit if you ever make another such ignorant comment.
So pay attention.
1. You are stupid. Keep that in mind while I educate you and go slowly. Very slowly. Don’t skip any steps.
2. You are ignorant. You have no clue what Papal infallibility means. I do you were not stupid, you would have realised this, and researched that topic before making such a stupid, and ignorant statement.
3. Far less forgivably, you are lazy. Your genetics made you stupid, you low IQ and bad parenting also left you very ignorant, these things could be forgiven, but now you have also been told (below) what Papal infallibility is, and on that basis you should verify it for yourself and then come back here, apologise for your stupidity and ignorance and all would be forgiven, but you will not do this. Because you are lazy. (And stupid).
4. You are proud. Wrongly so. There is nothing to be proud about, what with being stupid and ignorant. Because even if a miracle happens and you get off your lazy ass and go read up on Papal Infallibility, and realise you just made a complete idiot of yourself, you will not come back here and apologise. Because of pride. Which leads to Hell.
Now that we got the basics explained, here is Papal Infallibility:
Popes are normal, fallible human beings. However, when making an official pronouncement from their holy seat of Peter (their office, known as ex cathedra) their statements, concerning faith and morals, are supernaturally protected from error, not by the Pope’s character, which is invariably flawed, and in some cases greatly so, but by Jesus’ promise that he will be with us (the Church) until the end of days.
That’s it. That’s all Papal infallibility is. Simply knowing that Jesus is not a liar.
Unlike you, stupid, ignorant, lazy, and prideful protestants.