Can confirm…

Will you look at that, how interesting…

Yuval Noah Harari, who is Klaus Schwab’s right hand man, condemned the theory that a shadowy elite of billionaires and globalists control the world as “anti-Semitic” and “dangerous.”

Now, in case you didn’t know, Harari is the Israeli homosexual “married” to a man, that heads the WEF’s idea that they will be able to know and control, literally your emotions, better than you know yourself.

But one wonders, if the idea of a cabal of a group of people controlling the world is so absurd, how could people who believe such and outlandish idea be “dangerous”?

Let’s see what this flaming degenerate has to say:

“The global cabal theory has many variations, but basically, there is a small group of people, a cabal, that secretly controls everything that is happening in the world,” Harari declared.

“All the wars, all the revolutions, all the epidemics, everything that is happening is controlled by this very small group of people, who are of course evil and have bad intentions.”

“You don’t need to understand everything that happens in the world.”

“You just need to understand one thing.”

“The war in Ukraine, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, 5G technology, COVID-19.”

“It’s simple,” he added.

“There’s this global cabal, they do all of it.”

He warned these crises are often blamed on “the Jews” or the “Freemasons.”

“It creates this utopian fantasy. ‘If we only get rid of this small cabal, we solve all the problems of the world. Salvation!’” he pointed out.

“So, it’s simple, it’s attractive, and that’s why so many people believe it.”

Harari then compared the belief of a sinister global cabal to Nazism.”

He claimed the Nazis also believed that a cabal was trying to control the world.”

“The basic Nazi idea was that Jews controlled the world,” he continued.

“Get rid of the Jews, you solve all the world’s problems.”

The author of the piece, however, is at least a little aware of Harari:

Harari’s attempt to downplay the role of the WEF in shaping world policies is shameless. 

The WEF and Harari regularly boast about their plans to control the world.

As The People’s Voice reported, Harari has previously admitted that the WEF are creating a “technological Noah’s Ark” on Earth that will only be beneficial to “elites.”

During a discussion at the Warwick Economics Summit, he bragged that the world’s “elites” will soon be able to use their immense power to escape a global mass extinction event that they themselves will create as part of the depopulation agenda.

Quite.

And one wonders, if you study, for example, say the economics of WWII and what kind of moneyed interests were in play, and who benefitted financially from the war, and who financed Hitler… well… I’m just saying… might it be worth investigating? You know, along with exactly how many gas chambers were used where to kill the six million Jews. And also answer little details such as where the six million came from since there was not six million jews living in Europe at the time.

Little things like that, you know, just to satisfy yourself that Mr. Harari is obviously telling you the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

The miserable situation humanity finds itself in today, is due to the faults of men.

Evil, underhanded, parasitic men, from bloodlines that have acted in what is essentially a vampiric fashion, bleeding the host (nation) into a mindless drone.

And weak men. Unwilling to do what is, and always has been, necessary to stop tyrants, which, in short, is to tear them out of their ivory castles by force and execute them in the public square.

Regardless of which side you are for in the various thousands of conflicts in human history, it is an inescapable reality that the only certain way to stop massive, mass murderous evil, is by the use of massive, equally violent means.

And that old pile of canards that if you kill a bad guy then you yourself become a bad guy, or that he becomes a martyr, or that he will soon be replaced by another, or that somehow you lose, or that the ends don’t justify the means, well… who do you think came up with all those lies?

If another tyrant takes over from the dead one, well, guess what: just fire up the guillotine again. And dead martyrs don’t cause any more trouble unless they are Jesus, and that already happened. And no, if I look into the abyss, I don’t need to let it look back into me beyond any point I determine.

But more than the evil ones, I blame the weak ones. And you should too. Evil, greedy, selfish people and the human failures that want to have power over others, are know to exist and we should expect them to be the scum they are.

But it is only as a result of weak men that anything degenerate, evil, and subterfugeous is permitted to exist.

With regard to the weaponising of women’s biology against them, the lies told were permitted to exist by weak men.

Just like today the lies told about “trans men being real men and trans women are real women” or that minor aged children need to learn about anal sex in school, or any of the myriad other degenerate lies. And no one objects. No one says anything about it.

Well, I don’t know about you, but no one is going to get me to say there are five lights.

Nevertheless, here we are. You have undoubtedly bought into at least some of the lies. I know I had. At age 16 I thought equality was obviously good and right. Because I didn’t know about the difference in female and male brain structures. Nor understood the depth of affect that hormones create in the ability to think logically.

Had I know then, had these “details” been honestly included in the information related to equality, my sense of fair play, of justice, as well as that of millions that were similarly fooled would have been outraged at the suggestion that equality was fair at all.

It is not.

Most men today complain that women get lighter jail sentences for identical crimes. Or that in the theoretical sinking if a ship they get first place along with children in the lifeboats. Not me. I’m fine with it.

The reason is unpopular to say. It may soon be actually illegal to say. But it remains true.

Women have (in general, statistically, historically) a diminished capacity for logic and objective reasoning. Does this mean they are less “valuable” than men? Not at all. Children too have a diminished capacity, and their value can be reasonably argued is MORE than that of adults. Women’s value is no less than that of men, but that is not to say they have the same abilities. And if they do not have the same abilities, then they should not have the same responsibilities as men in certain spheres. Just as men should not have them in spheres that women excel in when compared to men.

If you actually want to be fair, then people should be treated in accordance with their ability to process and deal with reality.

The rules that might apply to 120 IQ Japanese man, are unlikely to produce fairness when applied to an 80 IQ Australian Native Aborigine. In fact, even just cultural differences are enough to cause trouble. A 100 IQ Ghanaian is not going to be treated fairly and according to his culture in 100 IQ Sweden; and vice versa.

So how does this relate to you today?

After all, you were not there to vote on women getting the vote, or any other of the decisions relating to abortion or any other number of things.

We now have an epidemic of incels trying to justify their bitterness by calling themselves MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way), which is mostly uncharismatic, not exactly sexy, or rich, computer gamers that would struggle to get a “date” in a brothel, pretending they are not interested in female attention because it poses too many risks to their financial and emotional well-being.

If you don’t play, you can’t lose.

And you are also, absolutely guaranteed to not win.

Let me tell you a real story, about a real guy. I once met a lawyer who was about 4 foot tall, had a club foot and a bent spine. It would take him ten minutes to hobble across his office using a walking stick and a set of movements that made him look possibly possessed. I felt sorry for him, until I met his wife. She was Chinese and spoke accented but good English. They had been married for over a decade. And she was certainly better looking than average. I’d have labelled her about an 8. And aside from his physical deformities. The lawyer was nothing to look at either. He was at best a 2, is a 1 was a radioactive leper quadriplegic.

Later, when it was just the two of us, he told me, unprompted and quite unashamedly, that given the cards he was dealt, he had essentially married a mail order bride after having discussed his proposal and arrangement with her. And ten years in, he was still very happy with it.

And are these the “men” we want? Are these the “men” that any woman needs?

You can call it legalised long term prostitution, or label it however you like, but that guy was running miles ahead if any MGTOW.

The point is that no matter how rough a hand you have been dealt, there is always something you can do.

So. What are YOU supposed to do?

Well, for a start educate yourself on the lies of feminism, equality, and blinkered, Protestant-inspired binary thinking. Then consider the Catholic perspective on women. And if after you did all that you come up with this:

Well… then you should probably consider moving to Canada and taking them up on that euthanasia programme.

The binary thinking scourge that permeates Anglo-Saxon “culture” is a blight on everything, but most of all on relationships.

The average lost numale who tries to take on board the things I have written in the last two posts, and countless ones before that, ends up thinking that you need to be some kind of retarded ogre that treats women like some sex trafficker to be “manly”.

But as we know, the stupid… it runs deep in the human species.

The reality is indeed bleak. But so what?

You giving up? That’s the solution?

No. Men have overcome bleak times throughout the history of humanity, And the ones that did so took risks. Sometimes massive ones. And yet… they won. And even when they did not, like at Thermopylae, Leonidas and his 300 stopped the Persians from invading Greece and saved one of the foundations of the West.

So learn the Catholic model, learn the truth about how men and women really function with each other, instead of the lies you have been taught to believe.

Learn why Mary has been removed from a position of reverence and respect as the woman who gave birth to Jesus Christ and then knelt at the foot of the cross, watching her Son, and our Lord being crucified after being tortured for hours. And think why such a woman would be treated with contempt by Protestants, when she was never treated that way for more than 1500 years previously.

Think what a man considering Mary may then conclude about women in general and the woman he loves in particular.

Is there pedastilisation going on? No. A woman that behaves like a drunken sailor or vulgar slattern is not deserving of any respect. And neither is a man that behaves like a cowardly brute or a slithering deceiver.

In short, get married.

Yes you risk divorce-rape. So what? Pick wisely.

Have children. Yes, you risk having that messy divorce with years long of custody battles. So what? Pick wisely.

Try and purchase land away from the city and build yourself a get-away or even a permanent location to live and work from that lets you be as self-sufficient as possible. Yes you risk biting off more than you can chew, or picking the wrong location and/or lose money. So what? Research properly and pick wisely.

Ultimately, it is men that create civilisation or let it collapse. The future is not going to be pleasant for much longer, and then, like it or not, you will have these things to learn and do anyway. Without benefit of adequate time to learn them at least passingly in theory before you attempt them in real life.

So learn all you need to about what actually worked for many centuries between men an women, that created the best societies in the history of mankind, that lasted centuries too. And no, it is not America, with their plastic food and striped toothpaste. It is countries like Italy, and Spain, Portugal, and France (yes it pains me to say it too!) It is Catholic England before Henry the VIII.

It is what had the wives of noble Franks and Normans follow them to Jerusalem on foot or horse and cart when their husbands went to repel the marauding Muslims.

And know that while certainly many women presently disqualify themselves from being worthwhile wives and mothers, so do many supposed men. And further, no human being is without flaws.

Read your Bible. Especially Ephasians, and understand what it tells you about the relationship between a man and his wife, then look to create that kind of marriage.

And when you stumble, get up. When you get crushed down to dust, rise again, better and clearer in wisdom, learnt lessons, and better able to suffer the slings and arrows of life even as you learn to live in joy, internal peace, and harmony, even if the world around you is fast burning itself down to rubble and mutated freaks.

Because, ultimately, civilisation, the future, and how or even if your children, will live, is all determined by men. So do your utmost to be one that can be, and is, and will be, counted amongst the ones who matter.

Before we get into the details of male responsibility or lack thereof concerning the current situation with regards to relations between the sexes, let us first consider what playing out the proper roles of husband and wife looks like.

This is where you will find that the Catholic perspective is correct and the Anglo-Saxon one in almost total error.

The Protestant world, having essentially surgically removed Mary, Jesus’s Mother from the entire Christian tradition, has, in essence, removed the female aspect of Christianity from its ideology. Whatever the more than 40,000 denominations of absurd Protestant cults claim individually and separately, one thing they all agree on fully is that Mary, the literal mother of Jesus, is no one of any importance.

At an extremely simple level of basic human curiosity, do you not find that strange?

I mean, God made Himself flesh, in the form of His only begotten Son, and sacrificed Him for the possibility of salvation existing for all humanity, that is a strange enough story. And he did it by being born to a virgin already promised to a man who never had sexual relations with her. And you are not curious at all about this? You are not curious at all about this woman and why she was chosen? And how she behaved in light of seeing her son crucified on the cross and then rising from the dead and as ending to Heaven? Zero? She’s just some fantastic incubator for the saviour with no lessons for us to learn?

Such a reality would be absurd to be considered as true in light of the story of who Jesus was and what He came to do and then did.

And yet, there it is. Every Protestant thinks Mary is essentially an NPC of little note.

But this is not coincidence. Nor is it anything that was ever part of Christianity.

Once you find out that the King’s James version of the Bible is also known as the Freemason Bible, because it was commissioned by said King James, the same one, who founded the Freemason temples we have to this day, which are extremely powerful Satanic coves of actual Satanists (most of the lower ranks unaware of it, supposedly, but certainly well known to all who care to know by now).

And when you find out that the King’s James version of the Bible has over 33,000 errors of “translation” including in the ten commandments, the most egregious being that “thou shalt not kill”, when in fact, the correct translation is “thou shalt not murder”.

Because God knows some people, as the saying goes, need killing. Killing sometimes is necessary. Murder however is wrong.

Most of the other translation “errors” are designed to reduce the figure of Mary and women in general in the Bible, as well as reduce the majesty and truth of Jesus. The last is not surprising since the baseline texts used for the Protestant translation of the Bible were “curated” by literal Pharisees that hated and continue to hate Jesus with the hatred their “God” (the Prince of this world) reserves for our Lord.

And it all comes to a perfectly logical conclusion when you realise that King James, was a flaming homosexual, obvious to all and declared in multiple writings to his male lovers (one in particular), which have even been collected in book format. All of a sudden, the diminishing, or even removal of women’s role and Mary’s in particular, from the Bible, is no longer some mysterious aberration, but rather, an obvious and clear intentional choice made by the enemies of God.

As a result, the Protestant approach to women is in many ways fundamentally flawed, oscillating between two extremes of the pendulum, either from strict and puritanical to a degree that invariably leads to mental illness and subsequent sexual perversion, or, to the modern current liberal to the extreme, accepting all sorts of sexual disordering as “love”, instead of what it is, sexual deviance, degeneracy, and mental illness to a demonic level.

The Protestant mindset, having had the meaningful examples and lessons from the Bible regarding women and Mary especially, removed in the multiple ways mentioned above, come to mostly erroneous conclusions about the role of women in the world.

And that’s without even mentioning the ripping out of seven books from the Bible, by the probably Jewish, and thus fake Monk with lust in his heart for nuns, a penchant to advising raping your maidservants, and calling reason “the whore of the devil”. I’m talking, of course, of your boy, Martin. Who ended up hanging himself from his bedpost, possibly in a bout of autoerotic asphyxiation gone wrong. But hey, you don’t get the leaders you want, you get the leaders you deserve. Take note, Protestants.

The point here being that given wrong starting points, without correction, you can only come to wrong conclusions. And this, with respect to women in the world, the Protestants have achieved in spades.

There hasn’t been a comprehensive study on this with enough data to be conclusive, however, the data we do have seems to indicate that nominally Catholic couples divorce at less than half the rate of Protestants. Given that most “Catholic” couples of today are of the Novus Ordo variety, and hence really only another kind of protestant offshoot, even if this is true, we can attribute it mostly to the still somewhat persevering momentum of original, actual Catholicism in the culture, and not actual Catholicism as such, since that is only still present in Sedevacantist.

But that’s a “big picture” view and not especially useful in understanding the approach towards women that leads to the best results for people on an individual basis.

Once you accept that Protestantism is really only the secularisation of Christianity, that is, the making human and human-centred of that which is Divine and belonging to and of God, then the errors become clearer to spot.

The anglo-saxon/teutonic Protestant imperative results in the mechanisation of human beings. This is obvious and prevalent in all aspects, and may be easier to spot in say the much vaunted Protestant work-ethic. Because apparently, eating a badly manufactured and mass-produced crappy sandwich at your desk while working your 10 hour day plus commute, is supposedly “better” (for whom?) than the 3 or 4 hour siesta that Catholic countries still take for lunch to account for human needs instead of financial ones.

In the relations between the sexes this mechanisation of the woman usually and most commonly takes on either the pedestalisation of the woman, or, conversely, the dehumanising reduction of her to either a sort of helper for the male or sexual receptacle for his lust, with little redeeming function beyond that.

This attitude is reflected in a myriad little ways as well as large ones. The trend, always is mechanising, with the related reduction of humanity. The “helpmeet” is reduced to someone that is, in essence, reduced in value due to their related inefficiency with respect to the human workforce from a purely materialist perspective. Alternatively, those human qualities of femininity that are not or cannot be suppressed, decimated, or destroyed in this manner are instead perverted into either an over-sexualised, lustful parody, or some form of supposedly higher spiritual state, unattainable by mere male mortals.

The Catholic approach, instead, is far more complete in human terms, which ultimately are the important ones. A woman is seen as a complex mixture of mother, daughter, grandmother, nurturer, lover, mistress, whore, wife, and giver of life.

Each of which aspects can be more or less prevalent, and, more importantly, each of which can change at different times and places within the same woman.

A man faced with a set of binary switches relating to women, is going to make drastic errors of relation when the reality is a complex blend of emotion affected, biologically founded behaviours influenced by the satanic zeitgeist of the age, in contrast to the natural order of life.

While the tendency of the Protestant, or materialist-influenced male, is going to be mechanistically oriented towards a more “return on investment” approach to marriage and relationships; and generally, treating human beings as line items in a financial statement or a machine in a system, don’t produce the best results. As system after system has demonstrated over time, be it the collapsing American military, the dehumanised police state, the corporate greed-o-crapcy of the banking and corporate world, or the sad increase in divorce rates from the 1920s to the present, particularly in the anglo-saxon and “humanist” atheist societies of the ex soviet union.

The Catholic, or spiritual reality influenced male, has an entirely more philosophical approach to relationships and women in general. It is not a coincidence that even in the negative aspect, of adulterous fornicators, the Catholic, latin-origin males, are renowned throughout the world as being generally more successful in the art of seduction. That facility with grasping the essence of the female, can and does present its own challenges when faced with the sin of lust, since a facility in seducing women, certainly lends itself to being abused. While in the protestant world, such “needs” are more likely to be fulfilled by yet another mechanising system, like official prostitution, or more fetishised versions of the mere expression of animalistic lust.

The woman, in Catholic thinking, is neither unnecessarily pedastalised or idealised, nor discounted as some sort of baby-making appendage to male plans of ordering the world. She is considered as an essential and natural part of the family. I will present a few more specific examples as a way of illustrating these principles in general terms; and so as to pre-empt the inevitable autist complaining that in his specific Protestant family this or that aspect never was an issue, let me point out, for the 7th thousandth time, that principles are applicable to the vast majority of cases and your specific counter-example is in no way relevant to the larger concept. Similarly when I refer to the Catholic world, I am specifically referring to actual Catholics, so Sedevacantists and the ignorant but well-meaning vestiges of it left in many Novus Ordo “Catholic” families, not the official, satanist led Bergoglian cult of paedophelia and death. Here then are a few examples:

• Serving men at the dinner table – in the protestant world this is either expected/imposed or viewed as oppressive. In the Catholic world, a woman feels proud to do so out of love for her husband, who, correspondingly, does not expect her to deal with many of the worldly aspects of life, including, in most cases, the need to have a job, or worse a “career” that substitutes from the joy of taking care of her family.

• Contraception – in the mechanised world, children are a detraction from lustful fornication, career advancement, luxury holiday and entertainment “opportunities”. In the Catholic world they are the golden result of marriage, the purpose of life, and the continuation of your family line and the human species.

• Being a housewife – seen as the undeniable oppression of women by the evil patriarchy in the materialist world, it is instead seen as a life goal in Catholic reality.

• Sex – while in some Protestant households the women and men do understand this dynamic, which is probably the single most likely reason for whatever successful marriages last in the materialist world, in most cases it’s either a rather brutal sex on demand as a right regardless of emotions, or, far more common, a sex life where the mood swings of the woman determine the frequency, and more often the lack of frequency of sexual interaction, as the resentments of a mechanised life build up over the years. The Catholic approach to sex is extremely Biblical, in that each spouse, through marriage, gives possession and entitlement to their own body to the other, and not as a result of some contractual obligation, but a conscious, irrevocable promise grounded in love. Imagine the difference in day-to-day frustrations, disappointments, arguments, or other negative aspects of life, when they all take place in the context that you body may be used to make love, and is given in love, at pretty much any given moment. How upset can you stay in those conditions? And if and when there is a big argument, you’re unlikely to let it fester too long, and in most cases not at all. In short, the resentment that builds up and seems to be analogous to how windows computers gradually become slower and more clogged with whatever spyware they always had in them, is largely absent and addressed more or less immediately with the driven intent to evaporate it.

• Social Relation/Respect of the sexes in public – Protestants get the idea that Catholics either pedastalise women because they treat them differently than second class men, giving them “undue” respect and excusing a certain flair for the dramatic, or, conversely, that they abuse them, because they see them as fascinating sexual and sensual beings in an unashamed and unhidden fashion. The Protestant approach is to either ignore women (so as to not offend), treat them as fragile crystal flowers to be unwrapped only at specified times and designated processes of their choosing, or as “equals” that you can get drunk and have rough sex with. Once again, the blend of realities concerning the female psyche are more varied, surprising, and rewarding, once accounted for organically and situationally, than when they are tried to be quantified and weighted in an excel spreadsheet of pros and cons.

The excising of Mary, as the mother of our Lord and saviour, from not just the Bible, but the relationship of women as a whole from their proper place in Christianity was an intentional precursor to the much touted “benefit” of equality and the entire movement set off by the suffragettes and the mentally ill “third wave” (or whatever wave they are now on) feminists led by such “luminaries” as Andrea Dworkin. The results of that slow-motion derailment of an Indian train, can be seen all around us. Abortion on demand up to and including birth, the human wreckage of broken families all around us, and the occasional survivors of such divorces and remarriages, blended families (such as my own) and that’s long before we introduce the wanton physical, emotional and mental abuse of adopted children by freaks like Charlize Theron and her kind.

In short, a woman who accepts with humility and grace her position as feminine as well as sensual and intimate wife, dutiful mother, and family home organiser and carer, is indeed a treasure to be absolutely protected, cared for, appreciated and loved in all the multi-faceted ways women may need from moment to moment as well as season to season.

The Catholic reality is that there is no fast and hard rule of a binary nature as to the daily grind of life, but traditional roles of home-maker and home-provider are the best approach in how to plan and begin a relationship.

Keeping in mind the many challenges faced by women today are essentially a weaponisation of their own biological imperatives against them, is a useful thing to remember, since the same reversing of that weaponisation, while adding in a small amount of logic, and rational thought, can ensure that future generations of women are an improvement on the current models and catch up to the modern male that has managed to integrate subtler sensations in his behaviour without loosing any level of testicular fortitude that would have been required a few hundred years ago to repel invading armies of enemy combatants.

For those of you who are subscribed to Kurgan TV, you will be more aware of the historical lies, astronomical lies, religious lies, and origins of humanity lies than most, but in general I tend to keep the sociological lies to a less direct regiment of exposure, and mostly on this blog.

The reality is that to demonstrate the absolute nonsense you have been fed since childhood is difficult enough even when you have solid evidence and factual, objective information to prove your points (see The Face on Mars, Systema, Reclaiming the Catholic Church), whether they relate to human history, the physical abilities humans have they don’t use (short range telepathy, seeing auras, etc) but can be learnt in a few minutes if someone shows you how, or the religious usurpation of Catholicism by active Satanists.

Jim As Aristotle demonstrated millennia ago, most people can’t change their mind even when faced with absolute facts in front of them. How much more difficult then to demonstrate to you the absolute incompleteness of your most cherished ideologies, or, worse their abysmal errors.

Errors that ruin your life. The lives of your loved ones, or that even determine if you end up having loved ones at all!

And yet, what else am I going to do other than try and help you see?

I will tag these kind of posts from today on with the label “social lies”, so if you are interested you can search these series of posts using the search me function. It’s a vast set of topics, and each topic is itself near-infinite, so don’t expect to get all your life’s issues answered at once.

Let us begin then.

The most important and fundamental aspect of life is the family. Regardless of your opinion about it, this is an objectively indisputable fact, since it’s the most successful way to propagate the species with the largest amount of safety, happiness and order than humans have yet devised. This remains true despite damaged fake philosophers like Stefan Molineux or whoever had a crappy family experience. Again, do keep in mind that these posts are generic and apply as true for the vast majority of people and are not a springboard for you to try to argue for your “very special situation indeed”. Also, in 99.999% of cases, even when you really think it is, it really isn’t that special. The concepts here apply to pretty much everyone, to one degree or other. Your ability or inability to grasp that truth is irrelevant to the facts, so try to keep that in mind, and consider these posts more like a discussion of things like gravity and the sun rising in the East. No one cares about your “very special” belief in gravity not existing and the Earth being flat. Least of all me.

And after that little philosophical interlude, let’s get back to the point: Family.

Family is (and can only be) defined as one man and one woman, coming together in a union, usually described as a marriage, for the purpose of creating and raising children.

Of course, this idealised situation is not what actually happens to everyone, some never marry, some never have children, many divorce, many end up with blended families and so on, but again, that’s not the point. This is not about you specifically (or me) unless and until you apply the lesson/knowledge to it, as it applies to your specific circumstances.

As to why you should heed my advice, that’s up to you. I am merely sharing what I have learnt after some decades of reflection on my own experiences which range from being a loyal boyfriend to a twice divorced man (the second of which quite a nasty one that also involved my first daughter), to a man that gave up entirely on long term relationship for a time, to now married in Church with three more children with my wife and a step-daughter from her side too. Some will think that a man that has had such a “varied” experience of relationships (or spectacularly chaotic on the scale of train derailments) is no one you should take any advice from. Perhaps. But then again, some of the best teachers are men who have made all the mistakes and learn from them enough to teach others how to avoid them.

I’m certainly no saint, but even Saul/Paul was a murderer of Christians and then became a martyr for Christ. So, sometimes, the guys who make the most and biggest mistakes can indeed be the ones to learn from. And it applies to many things. In this case, the specific lessons are with respect to the relations between men and women. I do think I have learnt enough on this to share some important considerations. And, as with anything important, whether it is painting, martial arts, or marriage, it is a topic you can, and should, always continue to learn from. There is never a final “mastery”. Only a relative one, which, ultimately, is relative to your life only, not anyone else’s, since everyone is unique.

Even so, some broad concepts apply pretty globally regardless of your special uniqueness.

Since the basis of the family unit in the Christian world begins with one man and one woman, it is this specific relationship that I want to begin to address, since all subsequent relationships related to it, the ones with your children, relatives and even friends either hinge on this one or are influenced by it.

My insights, as I said are pretty global, but best applied to the Western standard and specifically the Christian standard, which therefore is really the Catholic standard, since that is the origin if Christianity. If you are still stuck on Protestantism being some kind of alternative, it’s unlikely you will be able to benefit at all from this post, but you never know. I will be referring to the anglo-saxon/teutonic Protestant approach to marital relationships quite a bit, mostly because they are where the errors that destroy lie and grow and were seeded.

If you get stuck on the idea that Protestantism is “just as valid” (or even better) than Catholicism, or that it is anything other than the perversion and secularisation of Christianity, then, you are unlikely to be able to grasp the benefits of this post. But as I said, I hope you persevere anyway, as sometimes the oddest thing will show you a profound truth.

The best model for the relationship between a man and a woman is to be found in the Bible of course. And this is something I recognised (to my nuclear level of shock at the time) long before I was baptised and became a Catholic.

The relationship is pretty succinctly and simply explained in Ephesians, but the teaching is profound.

In essence, the man is to protect, lead sacrifice himself for and cherish his wife. And the woman is to nurture, love, submit and cherish her husband. That word, cherish, is pivotal.

Within that context, the submission of the wife is not some surrender to the animalistic sexual urges or other dictates of a despotic husband to be obeyed like a prisoner might obey a prison guard. And within that context of cherishing, the leadership of the husband is not some exercise in ego-driven authority and imposition of will.

In the explanation of how a Christian (hence Catholic) husband leads a non-Catholic wife to salvation, the lesson given in Ephesians is one of patient and gentle leadership. And for a Catholic wife to lead a non-Catholic husband the lesson given is one of gentle submission tempered with nurturing love. The key, always, is love. To treat the other, with and from, a position of love. If you lead someone with love, force, tyranny, autocracy, really aren’t going to happen. And if you show a man the truth by genuine submission to him in love while retaining your faith and integrity as a Catholic woman, there can’t be any resentment, passive aggression or withholding of your heart. In such conditions then, relationships can and do flourish.

The first, and most valid objection people have is, invariably: “Ah yes, but even if *I* do my part he/she is in no way guaranteed to do his/hers, and what then? I’d get massively hurt/crushed.”

And so, on that basis, fear wins.

In today’s world, the reality is that NEITHER the man, nor the woman is at all equipped to act in those ways. For most people, learning those ways of being, in the current reality surrounding us is something akin to a man learning the ancient art of cabinet making with secret compartments as in the furniture if old kings, by trial and error and with no prior knowledge. In short, no matter how careful you are, you’re likely to make mistakes. And if you’re the impatient type, like me, some if them will be spectacularly large.

So what to do?

The weak, the beaten, the faithless, the lost, the deceived, the arrogant, the lazy, and the wilfully ignorant, will —-in all likelihood—- become human flotsam of one type or another.

Wrecked marriages, broken families, blended ones like mine, childless lives, lonely lives, with enough damage to go round to make the path for future generations even harder and more confused and lost.

And yet, even so, and perhaps more so now, given the fast approaching dystopian reality we are all increasingly facing, the prospect of learning to be a cabinet maker able to build all the secret compartments, is starting to have more appeal than ever before.

If that is the case, then I suggest to you that the quickest and most comprehensive way to understand and succeed at creating a lasting marriage is to study and learn Catholicism.

I know, I know, all you Protties and Orthobros and agnostics are rolling your eyes now and thinking “here he goes again with his zealotry!”

But the thing is, regardless of your religion, or religious beliefs, if the model works and produces good results, why not use it?

If juggling 4 wives at a time gave good results, I would have taken it up, despite my not in any way subscribing to Islam. But the reality is that in my experimenting phase, I found that having a relationship with more than one woman at a time —-openly, not subterfugeously—- is not a situation that is sustainable in the long term, and certainly not once children are a possibility/reality. The best system, really is the Catholic one, and I learnt this to be the case, if only intellectually at first, before I became any kind if Catholic.

And even then, intellectual understanding is a far cry from experiential understanding.

Nevertheless, let me try to explain, as best I can, given the constraints of time, language and whatever IQ gap may exist between us, what I mean by the Catholic system of male-female, and hence husband-wife relationship.

The first enemy of it is the language. You have been taught that submission from a woman to man is bad, even when chosen. You have also been taught that word, submission only has negative connotations.

Similarly, the demonic spectre of feminism and supposed “equality” between the sexes is a constant toxic poison that permeates every aspect of life on Earth today. You really only need to use your eyes and a basic level of observation to note that men and women are not equal, and never will be. Even the physical structures of the male and female brain are different. The hormonal differences and physical differences are extreme and so are their corresponding effects in the psyche and emotions. And yet, somehow, everyone, to some extent or other, has been infected with this nonsensical idea if equality.

It is toxic and a lie precisely because it causes misery instead if peace. Above all, misery primarily for women. It results in fooling both women and men, into treating women as a kind if second class “man”. A physically less capable man, that has his emotions in a barely held together semblance of normality but in truth is a rollercoaster from day to day and certainly month to month, and who is subjugate to a level of solipsism that in normal men would be seen as either narcissistic, or at least self-absorbed. In addition to this, while supposedly “equal” this fake and lesser “man” gets preferential treatment in an almost endless number of ways. You can’t resolve difference by duking it out and shaking hands afterwards, they have almost no concept of the term honour, other than only paying the most passing of lip service to it, and generally will use whatever excuse works best for their privileged position to avoid responsibility for any number if bad situations that were caused primarily by their own poor decisions.

And presented in that light, it’s no wonder the average man, may find trying to deal with these “women” who have bought into the feminist lies, too much of a chore, and hence decide either to become human husks, focusing on computer games or becoming the equivalent of a modern monk but without the wisdom, dedication or faith, only the celibacy. And involuntary at that. Or, they become man-whores, using women for sexual gratification and entertainment; a different and more immersive kind if gaming, with more stakes in real life, and probably quite a bit more addictive, but ultimately, just another way to kill time and your chances of continuing your line.

But are women just these “equal but not” lesser men? No. No they are not. And if you can but get rid of that absurd, evil, and demonically instigated lie, and begin to see the truth, then, somewhat of a miracle happens. Not unlike seeing a long lost Atlantis and discovering it was always just below the surface of your favourite off-shore scuba diving spot.

So, what is a woman? What is her purpose? Her function, her place in the Universe and here on Earth? And what are the challenges and dangers she faces in being and fulfilling her true potential and abilities as a woman? What are the impediments? Let’s try and answer these things in turn and as simply, yet profoundly, as possible. The barriers to womanhood are especially important to note for a man, and consider them.

What is the purpose of a woman?

At its most fundamental, it is to make, feed, and nurture children until they are old enough to fend for themselves. As the child grows, the introduction of the male, the husband, becomes more important and hence requiring of more involvement. Which is not to say that the male presence should be absent in the first year or so of life, but in truth, the amount of biologically relevant input a man has in the first months of a baby’s life are almost inconsequential when compared to the woman’s. He, of course can be helpful to the woman in many other ways, helping her rest more and taking on more of the daily tasks that need doing, be it around the house, outside of it, or taking care of the baby in ways that are available to him.

Nevertheless, the primary person in a baby’s life is the mother. Even at a basic survival level, a baby literally feeds from the mother. This, whether you bought into feminism or not, is the primary, in fact, existential purpose of a woman at an undeniable, absolute, biological level. Once you truly understand that, and are able to do some logic, and consider some of the consequences of this inescapable reality, then many of the “second class man” attributes that would get an actual man probably clubbed to death by his peers not too long ago in the human past, suddenly begin to be understood not only, as not being evil or insane, but actually even as positive and needed aspects for the fulfilling of her purpose.

Let us consider some of these things now.

How the “flaws” of modern female life are really required positives of real female life.

Let us re-examine the faults of the “second class man” in this light.

Weak – Yes in terms if physical attributes women simply can’t compete with men. We are faster, stronger, able to take more physical damage as well as deliver more of it and so on. But as long as proper allowances are made for this by both men and women, it is not a really important difference. Bigger men are stronger than smaller men or children too, and it is simply accepted and known and allowances for it are made.

Emotionally Unstable – in general terms, and for very real physiological reasons, women’s emotions are stronger, more volatile and more subject to alteration faster, than male emotions. Their different physical brain structure, and completely opposite and powerful hormonal differences and related big fluctuations of those same hormones —-not only on a monthly basis, but even daily, and more so if she is not taking the toxic artificial hormones so many take to prevent pregnancy—- all serve to make her own internal states be far less controllable by her than a man’s.

But why should that be so? Because for most of two million years or so, emotions, being faster than abstract thought, have been the primary survival tool for women. A powerful emotion that makes her scream for help at the most innocuous of bugs, brings the stomping man in a hurry. It doesn’t matter if it was a harmless bug. Better safe than sorry, and the guy with the club can deal with it. Her biology is geared to reproduction, so when she is ovulating she will want to reproduce with the most viable genetic male present. And for two million years, that was the guy most able with a club who other men looked up to. Because even if he had the choice of females, the small tribe he belonged to required a certain level of loyalty that is thought if as science fiction now. Even if he did screw around, he would still almost invariably take care of feeding his children and their mother/s. Not so now thanks to feminism. Hey, the state can look after you. And maybe their wages get docked for maintenance, but you know… so long, girlie! I got me another baby mama I wanna impregnate this week. So in the context of the biology it makes sense. In the context of modern survival, not as much, but you can’t rewire two million years of wetware in barely one hundred years of modernity. So, the correct approach here is for the man to remain calm and over time, gently lead her to realise her anxieties are unfounded. Of course, if even after gentle and constant demonstration of your ability to rise to the occasion, not have sex with her sister, best friend, or random strangers, she can’t modify her behaviour to become more attuned with reality instead of her biologically driven imperatives, then, you may wish to seek solace elsewhere after all. After all, if you can restrain yourself and your hormones from bashing in the skull of every disrespectful, rude asshole you meet daily, that would have been a certain duel to the death in feudal Japan, she can learn to not freak out at every little thing that life throws at us. Even so, as a man, it is important you make allowances for her biology. And yes, the reality is you’re basically choosing to hitch your future to what is to some extent, a schizophrenic mental patient, but, them’s the apples you have. You can make apple pie, apple crumble, apple jam, apple juice, maybe apple schnapps and so on, but you can’t make tequila out of it.

Her solipsism – Yes, it is true that narcissism in general is on the rise anyway, and women are certainly prone to a version of this (as men are to another version of it, which is ultimately the same thing but present differently) but a woman’s solipsism is intrinsic, and natural and also a function of biology. The reason for this, is, again, simple. If twenty women survive and one man, he can still have a chance of repopulating the Earth. But if only one woman survives and twenty men, the human race is essentially doomed. In purely biological terms, or the continuation of the species, female humans are more valuable than males. Add to that that they are also far more essential for the survival of babies for the first few years of life, and the concept that a woman’s life is generally worth more than that of a man is obvious. Biologically, men are far more expendable. The literal survival of humanity has depended on this fact for countless millennia. Hence men are wired to be far more able and willing to self-sacrifice for the good of the tribe than women ever can be. When the SHTF, a woman will tend to look after herself first, children second, (sometimes this order can also be reversed, in the best of women) and husband a distant third. In the modern world, once again, her biological imperative, so useful and necessary for millennia, has now been weaponised against herself and against familial harmony.

Self-serving hypocrisy/lack of honour – in light of the above, you can see how the concept of death before dishonour, your word being your bond, and shame for treating others by a measure you refuse to apply to yourself all make sense in the biological context of being a woman, and why such concepts are instead fundamental to a functioning society… governed by men.

The essential survival pressure of men is objective reality. Bad weather, other men from a rival tribe, natural disasters, wild animals and so on. In such conditions men learn to co-operate with other men regardless of rheir emotions or personal feelings and everyone knows their place and the pecking order, because NOT doing so puts the whole tribe in danger and as such is likley to see you clubbed to death by your own male tribe members before rival tribes can do it.

But the survival pressure for women is essentially: other women. They threaten her ability to snag the top club-wielder of the entire cave system and as such, ensuring the best chance for her and her offspring. So women develop sneaky, false friendship, type attitudes, especially towards other women. By complimenting a rival, a woman, unconsciously or not, aims to lower the guard of her opponent, so that she might sneak her man from under her. Or her food. Or her position in the tribe. The very concept of honour, justice and fairness is completely steam-rollered by the idea that she needs to survive and feed her children if her DNA is to continue to exist.

While among men, without honour, justice and fairness, at least to a degree that leaves women light-years behind, is an imperative precisely because an ordered and functioning, co-operative society can’t exist without it. And who creates that civilisation, requiring of discipline, self-sacrifice, dedication, and a focus on future-planning, including everything from hot water and indoor plumbing, to antigravity spaceships and the conquering of the galaxy, are men.

Men. Not women.

So. Does this mean women are less important for the functioning or existence of humanity when compared to men? No.

Obviously not. And if you do think that, you’re obviously probably a flat-Earther, pagan LARPer that hasn’t gotten any sex with willing partners, and are embittered enough by it to be able to miss the logic described briefly above. Not to mention all the other vital aspects that I have not even mentioned for their obviousness, such as for example the breast-feeding women do, which is a necessary and natural aspect of child-rearing.

Much of the biological imperatives of women may seem outdated or no longer necessary in the modern world, but objectively speaking, while some truth can be attributed to this, it must be recognised that:

• That same biological imperative is literally the reason you personally exist. And me. And every other living human being. In short, it has served us well.

• It isn’t going to change anytime soon. While women should make every effort to develop their sense of logic, balance, fairness and emotional stability, the reality is that presently, wetware takes a much longer timeline to adjust than does technology.

• Our “masters of the Universe” present state of affairs is mostly delusional. Our technological victory over nature is fragile and temporary, and can collapse almost instantly. Let widespread economic collapse, a little war and the inability to keep electric power stations running, coupled with a loss of internet access, and we’ll revert back to cave-times social dynamics in a heartbeat.

• Perhaps most important of all, it must be recognised that a woman’s biological imperatives have been intentionally, consciously, and maliciously, turned against her. The very things that defined her usefulness as a co-creator of the human race, have been contextualised in the modern world to exhibit as mostly net negatives in the context of women being “another kind of man”.

But so what, right? In view of the above, what is the answer? What, should you, as a man, make of it all? How is the weaponising of women’s biology against themselves (and you) your problem, responsibility, or fault? And aside from all that, what should be your course of action? What, and how, should you behave to restore balance, harmony, happiness, and a secure future for humanity?

That post, is also going to be a long one, and will be posted as time permits in the next day or two.

PS: typos and “autocorrects” probably persist. This post has been done over a couple of days in between many tasks and not been reviewed for such errors. Feel free to post comments or drop me a mail with required corrections and I will eventually get to it.