Vox has posted a more detailed explanation of what I have been saying for nearly a decade now, and that is: Protestantism is corrupt from the baseline.
The blog he links to is definitely not pro-Catholic, as he absolutely lies about what the Catholic Church DID, if not about what was done by the Pharisees who have been trying to destroy it from the start.
As for the name of God, our Indo-European language tradition has an impressive and consistent history. In Sanskrit, the name was dyus; in Phoenician & ancient Briton it was dias; in Greek it was theos and zeus; in Latin it was deus. The word YHWH never entered our Bible until nearly 1,000 AD when the Masoretic Text (MT) in Hebrew was completed and presented to the Roman Catholic church as the authentic original language and text of the Old Testament. The eastern half of Christendom at that time rejected the text as fraudulent and retained the Greek Septuagint of 285 BC, which they still use today.
The name, “Jesus,” is the proper English pronunciation for His true Greek name of IESU. The Aramaic pronunciation for IESU is “yahshua.” That Aramaic name is then translated into English as Joshua. It was a IESU who led the Israelites across the Jordan into Canaan, their promised land. And it will be IESU again who leads God’s people from this kingdom of World into the Kingdom of Heaven. To use the Aramaic pronunciation, namely “yahshua,” is a mistake. Jesus, his disciples, and everyone else spoke Greek. Some of the Cain races who were their neighbors retained their native language of Aramaic along with the common language of Greek. Certainly, Jesus and his friends knew some Aramaic (He even spoke a phrase of it from the cross, Eli, Eli, lamasabachthani, where “El“ was a generic name for God. But Greek was their first language because it had naturally evolved from the Phoenician language of their ancestors. Those who claim that Jesus’ first language was Aramaic are simply wrong. Greek is the language of our people.
His lie, the implication that the Western Catholic Church is who believe the Masoretic texts and came up with YHWH, is typical of that kind of retardation that is absolutely required and prevalent for anyone to be Protestant. Namely, a total cognitive dissonance with any remotely logical aspect of reality. To wit:
The Catholic Church LITERALLY PUT THE BIBLE TOGETHER! And NOT from the Masoretic texts, which appeared only about seven centuries later! That is precisely what I have been saying on this blog for several years now. The Masoretic texts are the ones the Pharisees, or Talmudic Jews if you prefer to use the modern-day name for them, created, edited and perverted for seven centuries, before that sex pervert and literal hater of reason and logic, Martin Luther used them to still further cripple the original by also removing several books from it to make it fit his heretic nonsense fake religion: Protestantism. Only for it to be FURTHER perverted by the flaming Homosexual King James and his Freemasonic Bible the KJV which has over 33,000 transaction errors in it.
And no, the Catholic Church never “forgot” what the originals were. Not only did the Catholics, (yes with Popes, already) actually put the Bible together, they translated it into Latin. HELLOOOOOO…?
St. Jerome anyone?
The Vulgate is a Latin version of the Holy Bible, and largely the result of the labors of St Jerome (Eusebius Sophronius Hieronymus), who was commissioned by Pope Damasus I in 382 A.D. to make a revision of the old Latin translations. By the 13th century this revision had come to be called the versio vulgata, that is, the “commonly used translation”, and ultimately it became the definitive and officially promulgated Latin version of the Holy Bible in the Catholic Church.
Saint Jerome had been commissioned by Pope Damasus to revise the Old Latin text of the four Gospels from the best Greek texts, and by the time of Damasus’ death in 384 A.D. he had thoroughly completed this task, together with a more cursory revision from the Greek Septuagint of the Old Latin text of the Psalms.
After the death of the Pope, St. Jerome who had been the Pope’s secretary, settled in Bethlehem, where he produced a new version of the Psalms, translated from the Hexaplar revision of the Septuagint. But from 390 to 405 A.D., St. Jerome translated anew all 39 books in the Hebrew Bible, including a further, third, version of the Psalms, which survives in a very few Vulgate manuscripts. This new translation of the Psalms was labelled by him as “iuxta Hebraeos” (i.e. “close to the Hebrews”, “immediately following the Hebrews”), but it was not ultimately used in the Vulgate. The translations of the other 38 books were used, however, and so the Vulgate is usually credited to have been the first translation of the Old Testament into Latin directly from the Hebrew Tanakh, rather than the Greek Septuagint.
And here is the preface he wrote addressed to POPE Damasus I. Yes, POPE, because The Catholic Church has ALWAYS HAD POPES, and everyone knew the Pope was the Head of the Chruch on Earth until, you know, Satan came along and first with a schism of the East, then, almost 500 years later, with the pervert with a penchant for having sex with nuns and raping maids, came along and fooled a lot of people even further.
St. Jerome’s Preface to the Vulgate Version of the New Testament
Addressed to Pope Damasus, A.D. 383.
You urge me to revise the old Latin version, and, as it were, to sit in judgment on the copies of the Scriptures which are now scattered throughout the whole world; and, inasmuch as they differ from one another, you would have me decide which of them agree with the Greek original. The labour is one of love, but at the same time both perilous and presumptuous; for in judging others I must be content to be judged by all; and how can I dare to change the language of the world in its hoary old age, and carry it back to the early days of its infancy? Is there a man, learned or unlearned, who will not, when he takes the volume into his hands, and perceives that what he reads does not suit his settled tastes, break out immediately into violent language, and call me a forger and a profane person for having the audacity to add anything to the ancient books, or to make any changes or corrections therein? Now there are two consoling reflections which enable me to bear the odium—in the first place, the command is given by you who are the supreme bishop; and secondly, even on the showing of those who revile us, readings at variance with the early copies cannot be right. For if we are to pin our faith to the Latin texts, it is for our opponents to tell us which; for there are almost as many forms of texts as there are copies. If, on the other hand, we are to glean the truth from a comparison of many, why not go back to the original Greek and correct the mistakes introduced by inaccurate translators, and the blundering alterations of confident but ignorant critics, and, further, all that has been inserted or changed by copyists more asleep than awake?
I am not discussing the Old Testament, which was turned into Greek by the Seventy elders, and has reached us by a descent of three steps. I do not ask what Aquila and Symmachus think, or why Theodotion takes a middle course between the ancients and the moderns. I am willing to let that be the true translation which had apostolic approval. I am now speaking of the New Testament. This was undoubtedly composed in Greek, with the exception of the work of Matthew the Apostle, who was the first to commit to writing the Gospel of Christ, and who published his work in Judæa in Hebrew characters. We must confess that as we have it in our language it is marked by discrepancies, and now that the stream is distributed into different channels we must go back to the fountainhead. I pass over those manuscripts which are associated with the names of Lucian and Hesychius, and the authority of which is perversely maintained by a handful of disputatious persons. It is obvious that these writers could not amend anything in the Old Testament after the labours of the Seventy; and it was useless to correct the New, for versions of Scripture which already exist in the languages of many nations show that their additions are false. I therefore promise in this short Preface the four Gospels only, which are to be taken in the following order, Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, as they have been revised by a comparison of the Greek manuscripts. Only early ones have been used. But to avoid any great divergences from the Latin which we are accustomed to read, I have used my pen with some restraint, and while I have corrected only such passages as seemed to convey a different meaning, I have allowed the rest to remain as they are.
So, yeah… the Catholic Church is NOT the one that was fooled into using the version of the “Bible” that was edited and messed with by people who literally HATE Christ and want him to be in Hell boiling in a lake of excrement. Nope. That was the Protestants. Via Martin Luther and Henry the VIII and then gay King James who commissioned the even further corrupted KJV and set up the freemasons Temples as the current houses of Sodom and Gomorrah that have always been: literal Temples to people who at the highest vertices all literally worship who…? yup, Satan. Coincidentally the same Satan that the most highly “respected” Rabbis admit is in fact, the real god of the Jews. A lot of those videos have been memory-holed now, because the genocide currently ongoing in Gaze is making a LOT of people start to take notice of how Jews really see non-Jews. Like, you know, calling us cattle, and saying it very clearly in their Talmud that any non-Jew who strikes a Jew should be put to death and that it is not a crime to rape little children, or kill or rob or defraud non-Jews. Don’t take my word for nay of it. Go get yourself a copy of the Talmud properly translated (really hard to do but they can be found) or, you know, just ask a really high up Rabbi.
Here is a little research you can start on with a couple of archive sites.
Archive 1: A general primer. Not the best references.
Archive 2: Famous Rabbi talks about what Gentiles are for in the Jerusalem Post. the article has since been disappeared, but was archived before it could be memory holed. Alternative copy if the first one disappears.
Archive 3: This is a whole archived book, and page 62 is relevant concerning the talmud, the whole book is fairly interesting but not as dense with references as I would like. Nevertheless, various Rabbis are quoted throughout the text.
Screenshots of the Talmud:
Henry Makov archive: No doubt this man will be vilified to the end of his days, but one needs to ask: Is what he writes about Zionism a lie? And if not… then why vilify him?
Larry Romanov on the richest man in the world.
But I digress. Why? Well because all the New Age, Woo-Woo, theosophy, Freemasonry, Illuminati, Carbonari, ALL have roots in and are often led by, Actually Jewish leaders. Just check who the leader of the Church of Satan is.
And look at the largest cases of mass-murder and genocide on the planet and who pushed the ideologies that led to those massacres. Look up who invented Communism, what the Russian revolution and how many perished and at the hands of whom.
The whole point here, my Protestant friend and ignoramus, is simply this: Do you really trust that these people, who absolutely HATE Christ with a passion of a thousand burning suns, to not edit the texts that tell us he is the true Messiah? And who called them a generation of vipers, and chased them out of the temple by whipping them in the face?
For 700 years.
And then they made you swallow gallons of that other made up word and cool aid: Judeo-Christianity. There has NEVER been any such thing.
The word didn’t even exist until around the time a Jewish guy invented contraception for women, which led to what? Oh, right, casual sex, which led to no-fault divorce, which led to abortion, which the French, who always massacred Catholics as commanded and directed by the freemasons that literally created America by financing the revolution and then the “Enlightenment” with its massacres of Catholics, have now enshrined into law. Yes, the French have now passed a law that murdering babies is a human right.
So yeah, is it really that hard to understand they pretty much brainwashed the Protties into believing some made up name is the secret, super-special, name of God that you should never spell out? It’s nonsense, it’s always been nonsense, just like KJV “Bible” which is literally known as the freemasonic Bible, is nonsense. No one who actually knows the very basic reality of the Bible and how it came about, and the basic history of Christianity for the first thousand years can POSSIBLY be so retarded as to become or choose to believe, to be a Protestant. It’s nonsense. Like really low-level, obvious nonsense. A child can see it. The only way you can be a Protestant is if:
- You are born into it and brainwashed into it from birth. Same goes for Islam really.
- You totally reject logic and reason, as you “Protestant Pope” Martin Luther made very clear you should, stating that “reason is the whore of the Devil.”
- You literally refuse to investigate the matter honestly on your own. I’m not asking you to believe me over the lies told to you by the people who loved you growing up, who in turn were lied to and so on all the way back to that deceiver Martin and his heresy. Nope. But I am saying if you consider yourself a Christian, then by God man, stop being such a lazy, ignorant, unschooled asshole. Pick a book or ten, go read up what was going on in the year 50, 70, 100, 150, 200, 300 AD. Go see how and BY WHOM the Bible was put together. Go on. Stop believing some cretin who calls himself a “Pastor”. What are you? Illiterate? Or just sickeningly lazy? Pick up a damn book or ten. I’m not even going to tell you which books. I have done so before all over this blog, but hey, ignore me, go find out for yourself.
This is also the reason why so many have been deceived by the Novus Ordo fake Church, created at the behest of who…? yup…Jews again, and Protestants. The Novus Ordo is no more Catholic than Joel Osteen. And probably considerably less so than the savages on Sentinel Island. The only Catholics left are Sedevacantists. And yes, uncomfortable as it may be for you, the truth is only Catholics are Christians.
So, yeah… who knew that YHWH is a nonsense word? That the rapture is also nonsense, that Martin was a deceiver and that the only law of Protestantism is literally Satanic (Interpreth as thou will)? Catholics. That’s who.
But hey, don’t take my word for it. Continue stuffing your face with plastic American cheese, believing “reverend” Gimmebucks and his wife Tammy are true leaders of Christ and not just grifters in skin suits and fake tits.
It doesn’t really matter to me all that much, I know it should, because your soul is in danger, but eh… we all have our flaws. I AM Catholic, but not a very good one, and although now over a hundred people that read BELIEVE! have returned to proper Catholicism, and several of them have been married since, and now have babies on the way, I really don’t have the energy to try and convince Protestants of much of anything. So you go on now. Go listen to Billy-Bobby-Jean the snake handler or Miriam shriekfest the female “Bishop” that is an LGBT ally in your “church”, at the crossroads of Protestantism and Satanry, on the corner of Inferno.
After all, Heaven is supposed to be perfect. Which means really stupid people probably aren’t going to exist there. At least not the stupid, arrogant lazy ones anyway. They are headed for warmer climates. So your not being there when (if?) I eventually make my way out of Purgatory, is really for the best, after all.
This is why knowing your history – and by your, I include that of the True Faith – is so important.
If your Lies You’ve been Told about History series is incomplete, I hope you get to add to it.
Or if you end up writing a historical fiction novel with a lot of facts set around the First World War, that would also be fascinating to read.
Thinking further back, I wonder how much both sides were played by the same banking family during the Napoleonic Wars. The upheaval in Portugal and Spain, the liberal Cortes that resulted from Napoleon’s invasion of the Peninsula, the attacks on the religious orders in Portugal, and so on. That is likely a fascinating story.
Yes, it is incomplete. I need to add to it, but I am busy trying to find a more affordable way for all that also still generates enough to make it worth the hours I spend on it.
Regarding my fiction, I think the current situation, which is best described in my Overlords of Mars Trilogy, since it’s set in (unexpectedly for most) in 1999, will give you a much better sense of not only where we are, but what some of the solutions may be.