Posts Tagged ‘sedevacantist’

You are either an idiot or completely ignorant on the subject if you believe…

1. That 9/11 was the result of islamic terrorists flying planes into buildings and not done by people linked to Mossad.

2. That mRNA genetic serums are vaccines.

3. That mRNA genetic serums are not going to alter your DNA; and that of any children you may have after it.

4. That Epstein killed himself.

5. That Epstein was not a Mossad asset used to blackmail a bunch of pedophiles into doing whatever Epstein/Israel wanted them to do.

6. That John Podesta just happened to have pedophile/satanic symbols on his hands and similar reference in his emails by coincidence.

7. That Hillary and Bill Clinton are not responsible for multiple Arkanicides.

8. That Barry Sotero (Obama) was born in the USA, is not gay and is not muslim.

9. That the USA was not founded by freemasons with freemasonic principles from the start.

10. That freemasons are not satanists and knowingly so at the higher echelons.

11. That child sacrifice in satanic rituals is not happening at very high levels of government/s and billionaire gatherings.

12. That the Bilderberger group and Skull and Crossbones and the the Carbonari and Freemasonry and the Illuminati and the “freethinkers” and the Rosicrucians and the Novus ordo fake Popes and their fake Bishops, fake Cardinals and fake Priests are not all just different versions of the servants whose names are legion, of the Prince of the Air.

13. That all versions of “Christianity” will bring you salvation.

14. That the American government as well as many (most) others has never done terrible, deadly experiments on ita own citizens.

15. That evil, sadistic, pedophiles cannot possibly exist and be active at all levels of government, the judiciary and especially the entertainment industry, primarily in the USA but also the UK, Belgium, France, and many other countries.

16. That climate change is killing people of “suddenly” instead of it being the result of the mRNA genetic serums.

17. That the damage done by the genetic serums, the whole COVID “pandemic” and the incoming economic collapse was not all pre-planned years in advance.

18. That the intention to depopulate the planet is just a paranoid “conspiracy theory”.

19. That Covid was not studied, created and elements of that research patented in a laboratory.

20. That JFK was shot by Lee Harvey Oswald.

21. That Hitler died in a bunker in Berlin by suicide.

22. That the destruction and murder of the royal houses of Europe was not an organised, intentional ploy by the same forces that eventually infiltrated the Catholic Church and created Vatican II and placed heretics, non-catholics and Satanists on the Papal throne since 1958.

23. That Joe Biden was legitimately elected by the democratic process of voting in the USA.

24. That the Talmud does not permit sex with little children.

25. That Talmudic Judaism hates the Catholic Church (the real one, not the Novus Ordo fake “Catholics”) and has been behind every attack on it from the time of Jesus to today.

    Milo Yiannopoulous – The Freemasonic Response (with emails this time)

    Thanks to a little exposé of Milo I did yesterday, here, there has been a rather instant level of response, including on his telegram chat. Milo himself posted a link to the post, with the clear intent of pretending it was so insignificant it didn’t bother him at all. He did this though, only after someone posted a link to it in one of his chats, so it could be said his hand was forced and he took the only possible route he can take denial and attempts to pass the information off as “laughable”. No actual response to the facts presented in any way, shape or form, as you will see.

    It has been interesting to note the reaction from Milo, because he’s been far from his usually composed self. While Milo has fielded all sorts of “attacks”, even on live TV, with aplomb, I have never seen him quite this at a loss for coherent response other than denial, avoidance, subterfuge and outright censorship of the topic. But before I get to him and his own reactions, allow me a small pleasure in exposing the retards he has working for him.

    The funny part is that his own moderators didn’t exactly help the situation when they made attempts (predicted in the original post I wrote), to cast me as some poor desperate “gamma” seeking Milo’s attention. An attention that was not forthcoming because obviously I am just some nobody and he is… well… Milo: International Sodomite; or maybe Milo: International Ex-Sodomite now Pretend-Catholic. Or something.

    This was such a predictable accusation that I prepared for it. Mostly because I was sure the morons who would launch it did not pay attention to the fact that while I initially approached Milo, he was VERY receptive to reading RTCC and so on, emailing me back pretty instantly. It was only after he received the book, and I assume realised “this guy is not for sale”, that he then went “I’m too International-(Ex?)Sodomite-busy for you” silent.

    And yes, there have been attempts to buy my Catholicism by so-called “Trad-Cats” and no I have not mentioned them publicly, but I have recorded them and turned them down repeatedly.

    Anyone with an ounce of sense would have figured it out but not this idiot:

    Paddy and I have had a few run-ins before, mostly because I called him on his bullshit, and probably because he also forgot where he planted his potatoes or something, but even without knowing about Milo’s email reaction (see further below), it should have been obvious from the instant reaction to the post that Milo was not QUITE as busy as he wanted to appear, and judging by the liberal use of the ban hammer in that chat, not as nonchalant either.

    A few of the bans:

    Some of the bans were so instant and the comment made deleted so fast that not even the loyal Sodalitium types keeping tabs on Milo got a chance to screencapture them. One in particular committed the evil sin of simply writing:

    “How is he wrong?”

    That was an instaban and the comment deleted immediately. No dissension was permitted at all and anyone questioning Milo on the obvious Freemasonic signalling was silenced faster than Stalin deleted people from photographs.

    What was his supposed reason? Here:

    IT’S BAD FAITH QUESTIONS GUYS!

    Right. Except they are questions he has NEVER answered. Never even TRIED to answer. There is only one response to them and it’s always the same. Ban, silence, eject.

    Except wee-eelll… when it’s persistent little old me doing the asking then he does the only defence he has left if one assumes he is actually guilty.

    Think about it, assume he is a full-blown Freemason intent on deceiving the small percentage of the population that is no longer fooled by Ben Shapiro or Jordan Peterson, but in their quest for truth, God and a real Church is still on the fence about Emo Jones maybe, or thinking Church Militant are actual Catholics and not funded by Opus Dei hook line and sinker. If you make that assumption then Milo has no options left except to feign my facts are unimportant rumblings of some attention seeker, far too inept or relevant to even merit a response by our flamboyant, worldly, newly chocolate-dick free “Catholic” hero. Right.

    And why is that? Because do you know what the punishment for being exposed as a confirmed Freemason is? Do you know about their code of silence despite all their signalling? They signal because they think of us as dumb sheep and cows that will do nothing, understand nothing and be led to slaughter by them. Yet… the only penalty for revealing the Freemason secrets is death. And death by some rather gruesome means. Don’t take my word for it. Google is not your friend, but it can still dig up some stuff on this.

    So here is my take: Milo always was controlled opposition. He was the pied piper to the young ones. The Millennials yes, but more importantly the Zyklons. His rebellious, flamboyant and apparently disrespectful nature was captivating to young disaffected people who wanted to burn it all down. And he fooled a great many of us. Me included for a time, though I was early on to say that he would crash and burn or amount to nothing and eventually fade into obscurity long before his pedo-scandal from the Joe Rogan interview. So what happened?

    He upset his masters in some way. Which is why he was burnt down and had to suffer humiliation. Keep in mind that Milo was funded by some of the same people who backed supposedly “right-wing” things like Parler. Then that money was taken away. And after the due process of Freemasonic ritual humiliation and “renewal” (he literally has it in his bio, mockingly: Ex-Gay, good boy) he is being given another shot at it.

    By teaming up with the other supposedly also Ex-Sodomite Gary Voris (Who tries to go by Michael and who started up a business called St. Michael with Opus Dei cash, not freakily narcissistic at all, of course).

    So now, some bastard Sedeprivationist who can’t be bought is exposing him. Right at the start of his new venture. What do you think his lords and masters will do about that if it gets traction?

    In a way, this explanation may save him. Perhaps it will even increase the funds they pump into him. Because if he was found with his throat slit and his entrails pulled out (the penalty for breaking the oath), it might be a tad suspicious, so if instead they bury him in cash and boost him even more, maybe I will just be drowned out by the noise and the ruminant cows will still flock to the fake “Catholicism” that leads to the same pit of Hell of the other fake religions.

    Or he might just get a heart attack from covid. It’s hard to say with the servants of the one-eyed “shepherd”.

    And anyway, I’m just some unimportant “gamma” not worth responding to right? Except oh…ooops…note the times on these emails.

    Cool, Calm and Collected Milo… or maybe not quite

    And, it wasn’t really a “forwarding service” that I delivered the book to. And even if it had been it would not take months to get to him. The “forwarding service” (a lady called Kathleen) also summarily ignored perfectly polite emails concerning the book which she had not done at all before its arrival, which she confirmed.

    No replies at all to perfectly polite emails but instant replies to these ones. Literally not even a minute after I sent the first one the reply arrived. And the rest followed in rapid succession.

    Not sus at all.

    Just perfectly non-Freemasonic behaviour through and through.

    Totally straight stuff.

      Milo Yiannopoulous: Gatekeeper to the puppet starlets of “Catholicism”? (With Pictures)

      A lot of people are getting all excited and clapping their hands, much like trained seals, at the supposed conversion to Catholicism of Britney Spears, the hoped for imminent one of Shiea LaBeouf, who is in the middle of acting in a film about Padre Pio, and of course there is the flamboyant “coming closer to God” of supposedly already Catholic, ex-sodomite Milo Yiannopoulous. Milo has joined forces with Gary “Michael” Voris of Church Militant, another supposed ex-sodomite, and now does quite a bit of writing and promoting of their agenda just by virtue of the fact that with Milo come large numbers of followers. And he’s been positively *glowing* about Britney; and threw a sideways uplift to Shiea. What a revival of Catholicism right? What a magnet for all the young people to join it too! Yay! (Insert trained seal clapping like an evangelist here).

      I, however, have good reason to believe Milo is a Freemason and works for the enemy. And the score of pictures and screen-captures at the end of this post and his reaction to the questions on them, tend to be more than just mere circumstantial evidence.

      Read more »

        Ann Barnhardt is Spiralling

        I have written before about Ann’s blind spot, namely her refusal to look at the simple fact that the papacy has not had a valid claimant since 9th October 1958.

        The logic — a Catholic virtue she correctly is always championing — is inescapable, and yet, she still refuses to accept the inevitable conclusion that Sedeprivationism is obviously correct. Recently, however, she has done the intellectual equivalent of taking her objections to Sedeprivationism for a long walk in the woods and then shooting them in the back of the head with a .44 magnum.

        Before I present the post-mortem on the bodies, let me quickly summarise for any new readers:

        Truly, if the Catholic Church is indeed the One, True, Holy, and Apostolic Church instituted by Jesus Christ on Earth, and therefore its Magisterium is supernaturally protected from drastic and fatal error, the ONLY viable conclusion we can logically, legally and in accordance with the Magisterium of the Church, arrive at, at this point, is that every “Pope” since 28th October 1958 has in fact been either invalidly elected, or has vacated their office due to heresy in accordance with the Canon Law then in use (The one of 1917; which consequently also means it remains the only Canon Law still in use, since the 1983 version is created by the same non-Catholic impostors that have either never been Catholic to begin with, or have vacated their office for the same charge of public defection from the faith already discussed in some detail before).

        Even if you are not Catholic and don’t believe the Catholic Church is the one true Church, if you can actually do logic and follow the applicable Canon Law, you cannot come to any other conclusion that, as per Catholic Doctrine and Canon Law, the Catholic Church has been infiltrated by impostors and has had no valid Pope since in all probability 9th October 1958, but, even at its most charitable, as already explained elsewhere, definitely and without question since 7th June 1966, at the most outlandishly generous. 

        In fact, I believe that Ann is now starting to struggle with the cognitive dissonance that is assailing her. She is increasingly spiralling, complete with smoke, flames, and mentioning things that frankly are out of place unless you are a Sedeprivationist, since they don’t make sense in the context of someone who accepts Ratzinger. Remember that Ratzinger (or RatNazinger, as I call him) was one of the chief architects of the Protestantisation that was the infiltration and dumpster fire of treachery and cowardice that bears the name Vatican 2. Remember he is German and Ann herself documented how he was a proponent of the destruction of the Papacy by making it some kind of German union of Bishops. And trust me, as someone who has seen Germans have 9 hour meetings and resolve absolutely nothing, such a proposal is far more worrying than a simple dirty nuke going off at the centre of St peter’s Basilica.

        And now we come to the death of her objections. Consider for example Ann’s ONLY stated reasons for not accepting Sedevacantism as recently as her podcast 101 and then view them in light of the two comments she makes (below).

        Her two objections to Sedeprivationism were, as she clearly stated in her podcast 101 and documented here:

        1. The Church has to be visible

        Well… in this blog post, she torpedoes that point exactly as I have been saying for some years now. Besides which, given the internet, I think even actual blind people are aware and have visibility if they want to at all be interested in the point. Extract from her post:

         Remember, the Visibility of the Church is NOT a matter of how many people see it, or claim that they can’t see it.  The Church will always be visible – lit up by the Light of Christ – but people fallen into the darkness of sin will be blinded to it. Imagine Ray Charles standing on the Las Vegas Strip.  Ray’s blind.  He can’t see it.  That doesn’t mean that Las Vegas is “invisible”. It just means that Ray is blind.

        And 2. Well….62 years is JUST TOO LONG. Of course, there is NO prescribed time limit on an interregnum so…that one is just a “this is what I want/feel/desire” and has nothing to do with Catholic Dogma, Canon Law or historical tradition of the Church, all of which line up perfectly with my position of Sedeprivationsims.

        But take a look at this comment, which I would say goes precisely to the fact that heretics can’t be clerics, and consequently, all they do will become increasingly Satanic, banal and trash. Her post this is in is here.

         When instruction and correction are framed as “attack” by default, only stagnation and then profound retrogression result.

        There is no clearer cultural example of this today than the post Vatican II – Novus Ordoist Catholic Church.  Banality, primacy of individual conscience, toxic sentimentality, all yielding REBELLION manifesting as a contempt for sacred tradition, beauty, objective truth, and ultimately contempt for the Law, which is nothing less than hatred of God Himself.

        And notice also…she specifies Novus Ordoist…it’s a short step Ann… it’s called Novus ORCO. Say it with me. They are not Popes or Priests or Bishops. They are Spiritual Orcs. Twisted by Satan to do evil.

        And honest Catholics around the world are starting to awaken from their slumber and realise it.

        Join us Ann. You’re a good fighter and I believe, despite your struggles with reality of late, ultimately and fundamentally honest and a good servant to our Lord.

        Also, because your continued request to pray for Ratzinger to be recognised as the true Pope is about as likely as God listening to prayers of people asking Him to make Bruce Jenner accepted as the most beautiful woman in the world.

          All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
          Website maintained by mindseed design