The Amazing Bald-Faced Lying of Freemasons (Satanist)
Once again, the bald-faced lies of Freemasons are good for all to see. Behold:
The Freemasonic Satanist @CatholicDeacon on Social Galactic, has been going on for days now about how one MUST read the 4000 page commentary on Canon Law he has found in order to TRULY understand why a supposed clergyman (of any rank) who, say, publicly states he sacrifices children to Satan does NOT, according to him, AAAAKKKSSSHUALLLY lose ALL functions and offices of being a cleric and becomes INSTANTLY a heretic, without ANYONE needing to do or say anything further. Nope, according to him, such a person would merely lose the physical office they held but not the clerical (ecclesiastical) office and all that goes with it. To be clear, losing that (ecclesiastical office) is what happens when you become a heretic. You are no longer clergy, no longer Catholic and no longer able to give any sacraments or in any way speak for or represent Catholicism.
Of course, anyone normal and rational can see plainly that canon 188.4 in fact DOES say precisely this. A self-confessed heretic instantly becomes a heretic. Nothing further need be said or done by anyone. The fact itself convicts him, judges him and executes the punishment there and then. Ipso facto. It’s really childishly simple to understand and plainly written.
Now, why have I let this imbecille trumpet for days about the 4000 page commentary without comment? Because literally EVERYTHING he does is as predictable as what roaches do when you switch the light on. And nothing quite convicts them as their own idiotic, blatant, absurd lies. It is quite a spectacle for normal people to see the utter extent of bald-faced lying these Satanists do. They literally lie about the most obvious things to your face and do so easier than most people draw breath. It is such a stupendously absurd and insane behaviour that a normal human being struggles to believe they would be so bald-faced and above all so utterly stupid as to lie so obviously. So for the most part, people tend to assume there must be at least SOME truth to their bald-faced lying assertions and never take a look for themselves.
Well, don’t worry, I’m here to help. And no, there isn’t even a tiny fragment of truth in pretty much anything they say. None. Literally not a shred of it. So I let them run their mouth until they have secured the noose around their own neck VERY firmly. And climbed on the horse. And tied their own hands behind their back. Only then, do I take great pleasure in slapping that horse’s ass.
Allow me to show you, the TOTALITY of ALL the commentary in the 4000 pages of the document the Satanist fake Deacon has been referring to, namely:
A commentary on the new Code of the canon law (all volumes)by
That refers to 188 as a whole, confirming that the effect is brought about by a fact, ESPECIALLY one on which the law itself (the very Code of Canon Law of 1917) has decreed the loss of an ecclesiastical office. Note that. Loss of *ecclesiastical* office. That is, loss of the clerical state of being. I.e. condemnation as a heretic.
All that is being said here is merely the repeating of what canon 188.4 itself says:
Any office becomes vacant upon the fact and without any declaration by tacit resignation recognised by the law itself if a cleric:
Part 4: Publicly defects from the Catholic Faith
But… but… 4000 pages of commentary… yes… about that:
And note: ALL ecclesiastical offices. That means the Papacy too. It does not apply however to mere schism IF the schism is UNCONNECTED to heresy. That is an exceedingly rare situation in which one is in genuine error about some dogma but is not in fact defecting from the faith.
An example would be say someone who thinks because a wife must obey her husband, forced marriage is fine. It is not, it is an abomination and goes against basic Catholic dogma. But the individual is mostly and idiot in need of correction not an intentional and public heretic.
Anyway, that’s it. That is ALL the commentary on canon 188 part 4 there is. Which is really just reiteration, since, it is so blatantly obvious there doesn’t need to be any commentary on it.
But will our gamma satanist finally admit the truth? Never. In fact allow me to predict his next move. He will claim that the whole of V2 is just a little schism of error, not blatant heresy, and try to pretend THAT is what his point has been all along, abandoning all his other lies as if he’d never uttered them.
“No… surely he won’t now that you predicted it publicly before the fact!” You say…?
Wait and see my naïve friend. Wait and see.
Of course, it goes without saying that the commentary is irrelevant in any case since canon law is what matters, not what someone somewhere said about it, and the canon law of 188 part 4, is, after all, as all who have read it and are honest and understand the basis of Roman law is PRINCIPLES, and NOT case law, and have an IQ of at least 100, childishly simple to understand. A self-confessed heretic is NOT a Catholic, and can’t be clergy. And yes that includes the Pope and yes it’s happened before 1958 too, as this proves:
With my thanks to Chad for this further orbital nuke
The Amazing Bald-Faced Lying of Freemasons (Satanist)
Once again, the bald-faced lies of Freemasons are good for all to see. Behold:
The Freemasonic Satanist @CatholicDeacon on Social Galactic, has been going on for days now about how one MUST read the 4000 page commentary on Canon Law he has found in order to TRULY understand why a supposed clergyman (of any rank) who, say, publicly states he sacrifices children to Satan does NOT, according to him, AAAAKKKSSSHUALLLY lose ALL functions and offices of being a cleric and becomes INSTANTLY a heretic, without ANYONE needing to do or say anything further. Nope, according to him, such a person would merely lose the physical office they held but not the clerical (ecclesiastical) office and all that goes with it. To be clear, losing that (ecclesiastical office) is what happens when you become a heretic. You are no longer clergy, no longer Catholic and no longer able to give any sacraments or in any way speak for or represent Catholicism.
Of course, anyone normal and rational can see plainly that canon 188.4 in fact DOES say precisely this. A self-confessed heretic instantly becomes a heretic. Nothing further need be said or done by anyone. The fact itself convicts him, judges him and executes the punishment there and then. Ipso facto. It’s really childishly simple to understand and plainly written.
Now, why have I let this imbecille trumpet for days about the 4000 page commentary without comment? Because literally EVERYTHING he does is as predictable as what roaches do when you switch the light on. And nothing quite convicts them as their own idiotic, blatant, absurd lies. It is quite a spectacle for normal people to see the utter extent of bald-faced lying these Satanists do. They literally lie about the most obvious things to your face and do so easier than most people draw breath. It is such a stupendously absurd and insane behaviour that a normal human being struggles to believe they would be so bald-faced and above all so utterly stupid as to lie so obviously. So for the most part, people tend to assume there must be at least SOME truth to their bald-faced lying assertions and never take a look for themselves.
Well, don’t worry, I’m here to help. And no, there isn’t even a tiny fragment of truth in pretty much anything they say. None. Literally not a shred of it. So I let them run their mouth until they have secured the noose around their own neck VERY firmly. And climbed on the horse. And tied their own hands behind their back. Only then, do I take great pleasure in slapping that horse’s ass.
Allow me to show you, the TOTALITY of ALL the commentary in the 4000 pages of the document the Satanist fake Deacon has been referring to, namely:
A commentary on the new Code of the canon law (all volumes)by
Dom Charles Augustine Bachofen, O.S.B., D.D.
Here they are, highlighted:
That refers to 188 as a whole, confirming that the effect is brought about by a fact, ESPECIALLY one on which the law itself (the very Code of Canon Law of 1917) has decreed the loss of an ecclesiastical office. Note that. Loss of *ecclesiastical* office. That is, loss of the clerical state of being. I.e. condemnation as a heretic.
All that is being said here is merely the repeating of what canon 188.4 itself says:
Any office becomes vacant upon the fact and without any declaration by tacit resignation recognised by the law itself if a cleric:
Part 4: Publicly defects from the Catholic Faith
But… but… 4000 pages of commentary… yes… about that:
And note: ALL ecclesiastical offices. That means the Papacy too. It does not apply however to mere schism IF the schism is UNCONNECTED to heresy. That is an exceedingly rare situation in which one is in genuine error about some dogma but is not in fact defecting from the faith.
An example would be say someone who thinks because a wife must obey her husband, forced marriage is fine. It is not, it is an abomination and goes against basic Catholic dogma. But the individual is mostly and idiot in need of correction not an intentional and public heretic.
Anyway, that’s it. That is ALL the commentary on canon 188 part 4 there is. Which is really just reiteration, since, it is so blatantly obvious there doesn’t need to be any commentary on it.
But will our gamma satanist finally admit the truth? Never. In fact allow me to predict his next move. He will claim that the whole of V2 is just a little schism of error, not blatant heresy, and try to pretend THAT is what his point has been all along, abandoning all his other lies as if he’d never uttered them.
“No… surely he won’t now that you predicted it publicly before the fact!” You say…?
Wait and see my naïve friend. Wait and see.
Of course, it goes without saying that the commentary is irrelevant in any case since canon law is what matters, not what someone somewhere said about it, and the canon law of 188 part 4, is, after all, as all who have read it and are honest and understand the basis of Roman law is PRINCIPLES, and NOT case law, and have an IQ of at least 100, childishly simple to understand. A self-confessed heretic is NOT a Catholic, and can’t be clergy. And yes that includes the Pope and yes it’s happened before 1958 too, as this proves:
No related posts.
This entry was posted in Social Commentary. RSS 2.0 feed.