I posted on my long-since abandoned (but still present) blog back in 2011 how crime statistics in South Africa had been “hidden” for a long time, but the “hiding” was done in the usual African style of efficiency, meaning you could still get a very clear picture of how things really were.
They had put a moratorium on crime statistics for several years between 1990 and 2009 because wouldn’t you know it, after apartheid was ended the murder and violent crime rates went through the roof. And continued to stay there. Despite the South African Police Services and the office of national crime statistics doing that, no one told the hospitals to stop putting cause of death on death certificates. So when you added up all the “bullet to the chest”, “knife stab to the throat”, and so on on hospital death certificates, you still got a fairly accurate picture of what did not exactly constitute “natural causes”. The upshot of it is that in a very conservative estimate, for that 19 year period, there was an average of almost 24,000 deaths from violent crime a year. Every year. For 19 years in a row. That’s 65 murders a day.
I made the following comparison back then, 13 years ago:
COMPARED TO A WAR ZONE
By contrast, the total number of deaths due to the Bosnian war, which lasted from march 1992 to November 1995 and included instances of ethnic cleansing, carpet bombing and mass graves, has wildly fluctuating estimates, but these range from as low as 25,000 to as high as 329,000. Both of these figures are obviously wrong. The best estimate as a result of population census in 2003 is under 150,000 (more like 105,000 or about 25,000 per year).
This includes deaths from all causes, including things like poor conditions, disease and wounding or exposure as indirect results of the war, so is not limited to pure casualties of direct violence.
So a war zone that lasted the better part of 4 years could only do something less than a quarter the death toll due to violent crime that the “peaceful and democratic” country of South Africa did in 19 years. In other words, a comparable figure of deaths in a war zone when YOU INCLUDE DEATHS FROM NON-DIRECT VIOLENCE IN THE WAR ZONE.
In other words, death by violent crime in South Africa outstrips death by direct military action (inclusive of civilians) in a war zone that included actions of ethnic cleansing (mass genocide) and carpet bombing. And has done so, year on year, for 19 years in a row. Why is this not discussed in the world media?
CONCLUSION
Now I ask you: Just how “peaceful” and “democratic” and “successful” do you think the new non-apartheid government has been for its people? Please keep in mind that the deaths are generally disproportionately slanted towards the non-white population by representation. In other words, the biggest number of victims are non-white and the biggest number of perpetrators are also non-white, both groups being over-represented for their representation as a race in the country.
Every day in South Africa there are 75 murders and 120 rapes mainly carried out between rival gangs and in the impoverished areas where police rarely venture.
Keep in mind that neither the statistics I demonstrated 13 years ago with their respective impeccable references, nor the ones above from a single point source are the real numbers. The real numbers are much higher, with official statistics stating in some cases that violent crime since 2012 is up by 77%.
Another point to keep in mind is that again, in neither case, are we even mentioning the lives affected by violent crime that don’t result in an actual dead body. Just you know, some mutilation, rape, severe crippling and so on. Never mind psychological trauma and other such things.
For those of you more concerned about my apparent “racism” in pointing out these absolutely rock solid factual realities, keep in mind too, that the majority of these violent events take place between black Africans. Which is not to say white Africans are not affected, they massively are too, but as they comprise less than 10% of the population, it is still a fact that they are not the main numerical number of cases. If they were, there would have been not a single white South African left by now.
Now, I ask you, is it any wonder that even the black African can often be heard complaining that life was better under apartheid?
Compared to this, was it really so evil for the old system to have created internal puppet states like Bophuthatswana, where the apartheid laws of segregation did not apply as they did in greater South Africa, allowing black African to be treated like equals but under a system that actually ensured there was law and order and it was not a giant murder-fest for the people living there?
Which brings me to a wider point.
No doubt, boomers especially will be aghast at my pointing out with hard numbers and facts, the reality that black Africans are simply incapable of governing themselves into anything resembling a European style of civilisation. Oh how rude of me. How racist. Well, the numbers are what they are, and are similar throughout the African continent.
And before mass immigration, and even now after it, crime statistics in Europe reflect the exact same reality. Most crimes and especially sex crimes are caused per capita, by people that don’t need to suntan to get browner. But your modern sensibilities would rather “notice” and be “shocked” at my impoliteness of mentioning this out loud, instead of having that reaction at, say, just to pick one at random, the gang rape of a minor by 7 Egyptian men.
But my point is even wider than that. And includes YOU specifically. Yes, you, the reader.
Because you see, in keeping with your no doubt shocked (or even approving) face, I am now going to remind you of something that every South African knows, and a phrase that was often used by white people there when I lived there.
“You don’t have to be black to be a kaffir.”
Or in American parlance, “You don’t need to be black to be a nigger.”
And lest you think I am going for some boomerism where I say some completely idiotic thing like “I don’t see colour” (everyone does unless you’re blind, deaf and dumb) or “there is only one race, the human race” (genetics and reality disprove this too, just like a chihuahua is not a doberman pincher, though both are dogs), let me be clear that no, I not only do I see colour, I also see ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, and everything else too. And I take notice. I absolutely do. So do you, I am just honest about it.
But all that aside, I want to remind you that you too are basically like a feral monkey that needs a big stick to be kept in line. Oh, your behaviour may not result directly in a wanton trail of death, sexual victimisation and destruction, but it still kind of does so indirectly. Your tolerance, your antiracism, your deep hatred of uncomfortable facts, mathematics and logic, creates the conditions where such violence and such crimes are permitted to continue to exist and even flourish. And why?
Well, because like the feral monkey you are, you simply refuse, or are intellectually incapable, of simply adopting a system of behaviour that guarantees peace, justice, the rule of people by just laws, and a system that allows anyone to have the opportunity to achieve a level of practical freedom and success that is based on merit and reality instead of nepotism, greed, nefarious action and deception. Or at least that allows as close to that as any system in the entire history of humanity has ever achieved.
Because you too, you feral baboon, still, despite all the historical evidence and proof of it, despite the unassailable logic of it, despite the absolute truth of it, still, refuse to accept the truth. And the truth is that of all the systems ever created by man, none compare to that created by Jesus Christ when he came to Earth: Catholicism.
So, until you submit to the rules of the Catholic Church, which has without shadow of a doubt created the best civilisations on Earth, you too, are just a feral monkey that corrupts and destroys everything on a longer or shorter timeline.
And of course, the only Catholicism left is 1958 Sedevacantism.
And your dismissive reaction is no different to the one of the average murderous black African when he is told that his way of life is terrible and he too would be happier is he stopped being a murderous rapist.
The Joys of Antiracism
I posted on my long-since abandoned (but still present) blog back in 2011 how crime statistics in South Africa had been “hidden” for a long time, but the “hiding” was done in the usual African style of efficiency, meaning you could still get a very clear picture of how things really were.
They had put a moratorium on crime statistics for several years between 1990 and 2009 because wouldn’t you know it, after apartheid was ended the murder and violent crime rates went through the roof. And continued to stay there. Despite the South African Police Services and the office of national crime statistics doing that, no one told the hospitals to stop putting cause of death on death certificates. So when you added up all the “bullet to the chest”, “knife stab to the throat”, and so on on hospital death certificates, you still got a fairly accurate picture of what did not exactly constitute “natural causes”. The upshot of it is that in a very conservative estimate, for that 19 year period, there was an average of almost 24,000 deaths from violent crime a year. Every year. For 19 years in a row. That’s 65 murders a day.
I made the following comparison back then, 13 years ago:
COMPARED TO A WAR ZONE
By contrast, the total number of deaths due to the Bosnian war, which lasted from march 1992 to November 1995 and included instances of ethnic cleansing, carpet bombing and mass graves, has wildly fluctuating estimates, but these range from as low as 25,000 to as high as 329,000. Both of these figures are obviously wrong. The best estimate as a result of population census in 2003 is under 150,000 (more like 105,000 or about 25,000 per year).
This includes deaths from all causes, including things like poor conditions, disease and wounding or exposure as indirect results of the war, so is not limited to pure casualties of direct violence.
So a war zone that lasted the better part of 4 years could only do something less than a quarter the death toll due to violent crime that the “peaceful and democratic” country of South Africa did in 19 years. In other words, a comparable figure of deaths in a war zone when YOU INCLUDE DEATHS FROM NON-DIRECT VIOLENCE IN THE WAR ZONE.
In other words, death by violent crime in South Africa outstrips death by direct military action (inclusive of civilians) in a war zone that included actions of ethnic cleansing (mass genocide) and carpet bombing. And has done so, year on year, for 19 years in a row. Why is this not discussed in the world media?
CONCLUSION
Now I ask you: Just how “peaceful” and “democratic” and “successful” do you think the new non-apartheid government has been for its people? Please keep in mind that the deaths are generally disproportionately slanted towards the non-white population by representation. In other words, the biggest number of victims are non-white and the biggest number of perpetrators are also non-white, both groups being over-represented for their representation as a race in the country.
13 years have passed since I wrote that.
Well, things have not improved.
Every day in South Africa there are 75 murders and 120 rapes mainly carried out between rival gangs and in the impoverished areas where police rarely venture.
Keep in mind that neither the statistics I demonstrated 13 years ago with their respective impeccable references, nor the ones above from a single point source are the real numbers. The real numbers are much higher, with official statistics stating in some cases that violent crime since 2012 is up by 77%.
Another point to keep in mind is that again, in neither case, are we even mentioning the lives affected by violent crime that don’t result in an actual dead body. Just you know, some mutilation, rape, severe crippling and so on. Never mind psychological trauma and other such things.
For those of you more concerned about my apparent “racism” in pointing out these absolutely rock solid factual realities, keep in mind too, that the majority of these violent events take place between black Africans. Which is not to say white Africans are not affected, they massively are too, but as they comprise less than 10% of the population, it is still a fact that they are not the main numerical number of cases. If they were, there would have been not a single white South African left by now.
Now, I ask you, is it any wonder that even the black African can often be heard complaining that life was better under apartheid?
Compared to this, was it really so evil for the old system to have created internal puppet states like Bophuthatswana, where the apartheid laws of segregation did not apply as they did in greater South Africa, allowing black African to be treated like equals but under a system that actually ensured there was law and order and it was not a giant murder-fest for the people living there?
Which brings me to a wider point.
No doubt, boomers especially will be aghast at my pointing out with hard numbers and facts, the reality that black Africans are simply incapable of governing themselves into anything resembling a European style of civilisation. Oh how rude of me. How racist. Well, the numbers are what they are, and are similar throughout the African continent.
And before mass immigration, and even now after it, crime statistics in Europe reflect the exact same reality. Most crimes and especially sex crimes are caused per capita, by people that don’t need to suntan to get browner. But your modern sensibilities would rather “notice” and be “shocked” at my impoliteness of mentioning this out loud, instead of having that reaction at, say, just to pick one at random, the gang rape of a minor by 7 Egyptian men.
But my point is even wider than that. And includes YOU specifically. Yes, you, the reader.
Because you see, in keeping with your no doubt shocked (or even approving) face, I am now going to remind you of something that every South African knows, and a phrase that was often used by white people there when I lived there.
“You don’t have to be black to be a kaffir.”
Or in American parlance, “You don’t need to be black to be a nigger.”
And lest you think I am going for some boomerism where I say some completely idiotic thing like “I don’t see colour” (everyone does unless you’re blind, deaf and dumb) or “there is only one race, the human race” (genetics and reality disprove this too, just like a chihuahua is not a doberman pincher, though both are dogs), let me be clear that no, I not only do I see colour, I also see ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, and everything else too. And I take notice. I absolutely do. So do you, I am just honest about it.
But all that aside, I want to remind you that you too are basically like a feral monkey that needs a big stick to be kept in line. Oh, your behaviour may not result directly in a wanton trail of death, sexual victimisation and destruction, but it still kind of does so indirectly. Your tolerance, your antiracism, your deep hatred of uncomfortable facts, mathematics and logic, creates the conditions where such violence and such crimes are permitted to continue to exist and even flourish. And why?
Well, because like the feral monkey you are, you simply refuse, or are intellectually incapable, of simply adopting a system of behaviour that guarantees peace, justice, the rule of people by just laws, and a system that allows anyone to have the opportunity to achieve a level of practical freedom and success that is based on merit and reality instead of nepotism, greed, nefarious action and deception. Or at least that allows as close to that as any system in the entire history of humanity has ever achieved.
Because you too, you feral baboon, still, despite all the historical evidence and proof of it, despite the unassailable logic of it, despite the absolute truth of it, still, refuse to accept the truth. And the truth is that of all the systems ever created by man, none compare to that created by Jesus Christ when he came to Earth: Catholicism.
So, until you submit to the rules of the Catholic Church, which has without shadow of a doubt created the best civilisations on Earth, you too, are just a feral monkey that corrupts and destroys everything on a longer or shorter timeline.
And of course, the only Catholicism left is 1958 Sedevacantism.
And your dismissive reaction is no different to the one of the average murderous black African when he is told that his way of life is terrible and he too would be happier is he stopped being a murderous rapist.
No related posts.
This entry was posted in Sedevacantism, Social Commentary. RSS 2.0 feed.