In Caveman Theory I describe in more detail how women have several challenges before them, one is the learning to do logic and reason better, in order to catch up to the changes men have taken on over the last hundred years or so, but I also have a whole section on how women have been dehumanised by the various narratives.
It is an insidious process and has resulted in a lot of damage to both sexes. Men, because they become dumb and binary in their conception of women, and women more or less for the same reason, but even more so, because all the beauty, subtlety and positive aspects of women get literally obliterated.
Here is a typical example, placed outside one of the local councils in Italy.
Yes it’s a crappy picture, but it deserves no better. The writing says:
Some women choose to follow men, others choose to follow their dreams.
That is what in hypnosis is called a double-bind. It’s language that is supposed to present a choice, but in reality removes all options. The unstated implication, which your unconscious picks up on even if your conscious brain does not, is that following a man MUST be mutually exclusive to following your dreams.
The juxtaposition is EITHER you follow your dreams (and abandon men altogether) OR you follow a man, AND THEREFORE, NECESSARILY abandon your dreams altogether.
There is no place at all, in that false equivalency statement for a woman that WANTS and maybe (gasp!) even LIKES the idea of being gently led by a man that cares about her, and making a home for him and their children, being a housewife that dedicates herself to her family that way, as her husband does by providing for them all.
Even a woman that just sees the making of a family with a man, the literal creation of children and raising them, as her aim in life, is essentially left with a bad “taste” from that idiotic sign. Because the implication there, unstated directly but absolutely implied by the double-bind, is that your own dreams and sensations of being in the right place with the universe are impacted on, in direct proportion to which you liaise with a man.
It is literally evil. The sole intent of it is to try and drive a wedge of mistrust, depression and blame on the man for “destroying her dreams”. And women being solipsistic, remember, they are already inclined to believe two other nonsensical ideas:
- That life is about “being happy” ( a concept they cannot rigidly define if their life depended on it), and
- That whoever is nearest them, is inevitably responsible for whatever misery they feel, even if it comes form their own lack of imagination, genetic depression, recent drug use, or whatever else.
So that sentence is perfectly designed to attach itself to the weaknesses of a woman to begin with and then weaponise them against men in general.
I go into a lot more depth in the book on this, but think about it for a second, thanks to a bunch of shows, from Everybody Loves Raymond to Peppa Pig, the zeitgeist has been to present men and especially fathers and husbands as bumbling idiots. The reality is that if those “bumbling idiots” disappeared from existence today, before the week-end women would be savagely assaulting each other in the street, and two weeks later would probably be reduced to Haitian levels of anarchy and cannibalism.
That aside, the general practice of complimenting a man, or being grateful to him for his efforts in the family home, are essentially as rare as dodo teeth.
There are literally countless support groups for women, for every possible thing that might happen to them in life, but there are no such structures or support groups for men. In most cases there really isn’t even a single support group of any kind in most cities around the world. And it’s all fuelled by toxic nonsense like that image.
99.9999% of people will not even realise the subliminal messaging they are subjected to in this regard throughout their day. This is not noticed or understood by women nor men. But you are being lied to and trained to respond in certain ways. Women on a generic, unspecified, nebulous anger at men (for stealing their dreams, don’t you know!) and men, given this, will tend to treat women as disposable ejaculation ports, because why shouldn’t they, when they are denigrated and treated as if they are all some kind of woman hating, perverted, incompetent idiots, well… may as well play along then, because fuck it.
And the result is a mechanisation, dehumanisation, objectification of both men and women. Those are the fruits of Feminism. A landscape deserted of emotions other than bitterness, acidity, shrewishness, anger, sadness, and so on. In short, a lovelessness that makes the barren land of the Moon seem a fertile forest.
In the immediately next post, I will show you what actual women, real women, who have not bought into that narrative, and who appreciate, respect, and listen to their husbands look like. And why, because of it, they are loved beyond measure by the men they married. By being truly female, truly feminine, they have achieved that kind of marriage and relationship that not only lasts over time, but continues to grow and evolve and creates a tapestry of life that is passed down to children, grandchildren and so on.
I was going to tack that on here, but it deserves its own post, and I think you’ll see why.
